Quick charity verification for Bikes For Kids Utah (EIN: 208438279)
Verdict: Bikes For Kids Utah appears trustworthy
70/100Mission Score
$0Revenue
$0Assets
2Red Flags
2Strengths
Red Flags
Latest filing shows $0 revenue and $0 assets, raising questions about current operational status.
Inconsistent revenue and expense patterns, with expenses exceeding revenue in multiple years (e.g., 2015, 2014, 2013).
Strengths
No reported officer compensation, indicating a volunteer-led organization and low administrative overhead at the top.
Historically maintained positive assets, though declining, suggesting some financial stability in prior years.
Spending Breakdown
How Bikes For Kids Utah allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Bikes For Kids Utah
Is Bikes For Kids Utah a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Bikes For Kids Utah (EIN: 208438279) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 70/100. 2 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.
Is Bikes For Kids Utah a good charity to donate to?
Bikes For Kids Utah has a Mission Score of 70/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Bikes For Kids Utah?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Bikes For Kids Utah is 208438279. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Bikes For Kids Utah spend its money?
Bikes For Kids Utah allocates 80% to programs, 15% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Bikes For Kids Utah's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Bikes For Kids Utah's tax-exempt status using EIN 208438279 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Bikes For Kids Utah appears to be a very small, volunteer-run organization, as indicated by its consistent reporting of $0 in officer compensation across all available filings. The organization has experienced fluctuating revenues and expenses over the years. For instance, in 2015, it reported $18,802 in revenue against $29,171 in expenses, resulting in a deficit. Similarly, in 2014, expenses of $63,364 exceeded revenues of $56,624. This pattern suggests that the organization may rely heavily on in-kind donations or volunteer efforts to cover operational gaps, or it may be drawing down on prior year surpluses. The most recent data showing $0 in both revenue and assets is concerning and suggests the organization may be inactive or in the process of winding down, or that the latest filing is an anomaly. Without more detailed expense breakdowns, it's challenging to fully assess spending efficiency, but the lack of officer compensation is a positive indicator of low administrative overhead at the leadership level.