Periods where expenses significantly exceeded revenue (e.g., 2013 where expenses were $91,664 against $75,731 revenue)
Strengths
Consistent 0% officer compensation
Positive net assets and zero liabilities in the latest filing
Maintained an asset base despite revenue fluctuations
Spending Breakdown
How Bioregional Conservacy & Reclamation Tr allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
85%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Bioregional Conservacy & Reclamation Tr
Is Bioregional Conservacy & Reclamation Tr a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Bioregional Conservacy & Reclamation Tr (EIN: 16153292) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 2 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Bioregional Conservacy & Reclamation Tr a good charity to donate to?
Bioregional Conservacy & Reclamation Tr has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $45K. Assets: $87K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Bioregional Conservacy & Reclamation Tr?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Bioregional Conservacy & Reclamation Tr is 16153292. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Bioregional Conservacy & Reclamation Tr spend its money?
Bioregional Conservacy & Reclamation Tr allocates 85% to programs, 10% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Bioregional Conservacy & Reclamation Tr's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Bioregional Conservacy & Reclamation Tr's tax-exempt status using EIN 16153292 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Bioregional Conservacy & Reclamation Tr demonstrates a fluctuating financial history, with revenues varying significantly year-to-year, from a high of $80,323 in 2011 to a low of $34,632 in 2014. Despite these fluctuations, the organization has maintained a relatively stable asset base, currently at $86,885, and has consistently reported zero officer compensation, indicating a volunteer-led or very lean executive structure. The organization's expenses have generally tracked its revenue, though there were periods like 2013 where expenses ($91,664) significantly exceeded revenue ($75,731), leading to a decrease in assets and an increase in liabilities. However, they have since recovered, showing positive net assets and no liabilities in their latest filing. The consistent reporting of zero officer compensation across all available filings suggests a strong commitment to directing funds towards their mission rather than administrative overhead related to executive salaries.