Quick charity verification for Boothbay Region Humane Society (EIN: 16015740)
Verdict: Boothbay Region Humane Society shows mixed signals
60/100Mission Score
$0Revenue
$0Assets
2Red Flags
2Strengths
Red Flags
Consistent operational deficits (expenses exceeding revenue) across all reported years.
Significant decline in total assets, from $1,787,296 in 2009 to $1,043,390 in 2015.
Strengths
No reported officer compensation, indicating low executive overhead.
Zero reported liabilities in the most recent filing (2015).
Spending Breakdown
How Boothbay Region Humane Society allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Boothbay Region Humane Society
Is Boothbay Region Humane Society a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Boothbay Region Humane Society (EIN: 16015740) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 60/100. 2 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.
Is Boothbay Region Humane Society a good charity to donate to?
Boothbay Region Humane Society has a Mission Score of 60/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Boothbay Region Humane Society?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Boothbay Region Humane Society is 16015740. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Boothbay Region Humane Society spend its money?
Boothbay Region Humane Society allocates 80% to programs, 15% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Boothbay Region Humane Society's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Boothbay Region Humane Society's tax-exempt status using EIN 16015740 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Boothbay Region Humane Society appears to be in a challenging financial position, consistently spending more than it takes in over the past several years. For example, in 2015, expenses were $543,121 against revenues of $530,494, and this trend of deficit spending is evident across all reported periods. This sustained operational deficit has led to a significant decline in assets, from $1,787,296 in 2009 to $1,043,390 in 2015, representing a decrease of over 40%. While the organization reports zero liabilities in its most recent filings, the continuous erosion of its asset base due to spending exceeding revenue raises concerns about long-term sustainability. The lack of reported officer compensation across all filings suggests a commitment to minimizing administrative overhead in that specific area, which is a positive sign for donor confidence regarding executive pay. However, without a detailed breakdown of expenses, it's difficult to fully assess spending efficiency beyond the overall deficit.