Declining assets over time (from $12,404 in 201112 to $7,688 currently)
Unknown NTEE code, limiting understanding of programmatic focus
Very low revenue generation (latest revenue $1,626)
Strengths
No officer compensation reported, indicating low executive overhead
Consistent filing of IRS 990 forms, demonstrating transparency in reporting
Spending Breakdown
How Bridgham College Trust Fund 100 002 Nect allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
75%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Bridgham College Trust Fund 100 002 Nect
Is Bridgham College Trust Fund 100 002 Nect a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Bridgham College Trust Fund 100 002 Nect (EIN: 16007759) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 40/100. 4 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.
Is Bridgham College Trust Fund 100 002 Nect a good charity to donate to?
Bridgham College Trust Fund 100 002 Nect has a Mission Score of 40/100. Revenue: $2K. Assets: $8K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Bridgham College Trust Fund 100 002 Nect?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Bridgham College Trust Fund 100 002 Nect is 16007759. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Bridgham College Trust Fund 100 002 Nect spend its money?
Bridgham College Trust Fund 100 002 Nect allocates 75% to programs, 15% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Bridgham College Trust Fund 100 002 Nect's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Bridgham College Trust Fund 100 002 Nect's tax-exempt status using EIN 16007759 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Bridgham College Trust Fund 100 002 Nect appears to be a very small organization with limited financial activity. Its revenue has consistently been low, with the latest reported revenue at $1,626 and expenses often exceeding revenue, such as in 202012 where revenue was $319 against $975 in expenses. This consistent deficit spending has led to a gradual decline in assets over the years, from $12,404 in 201112 to $7,688 currently. The organization's financial health is concerning given its inability to generate sufficient revenue to cover its expenses.
Spending efficiency is difficult to assess precisely without a detailed breakdown of expenses, but the consistent net losses suggest that the organization is not operating efficiently or is drawing down its principal. Given the lack of officer compensation reported across all filings, it's likely that administrative costs are minimal, but the overall financial picture indicates a struggle to maintain operations. The organization's small scale and consistent asset decline raise questions about its long-term sustainability and impact.
Transparency is generally good, with seven years of IRS 990 filings available. However, the NTEE code is unknown, which limits understanding of its specific programmatic focus. The absence of officer compensation is a positive indicator regarding executive pay, but the overall financial performance suggests a need for greater financial stability and potentially a clearer strategy for revenue generation or asset management.