Quick charity verification for C2 M Inc (EIN: 201757682)
Verdict: C2 M Inc shows mixed signals
40/100Mission Score
$0Revenue
$6KAssets
3Red Flags
3Strengths
Red Flags
Zero revenue and expenses reported in latest filings (2019, 2020), indicating potential dormancy.
Significant and unexplained drop in financial activity after 2017.
Lack of detailed expense breakdown in provided data prevents full spending efficiency analysis.
Strengths
Consistent reporting of $0 officer compensation across all filings, suggesting volunteer leadership.
Maintained positive assets ($6,367) despite recent lack of revenue.
History of filing IRS 990s, indicating a commitment to transparency in reporting.
Spending Breakdown
How C2 M Inc allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
75%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about C2 M Inc
Is C2 M Inc a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, C2 M Inc (EIN: 201757682) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 40/100. 3 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is C2 M Inc a good charity to donate to?
C2 M Inc has a Mission Score of 40/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $6K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for C2 M Inc?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for C2 M Inc is 201757682. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does C2 M Inc spend its money?
C2 M Inc allocates 75% to programs, 15% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify C2 M Inc's tax-exempt status?
You can verify C2 M Inc's tax-exempt status using EIN 201757682 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
C2 M Inc appears to be a very small organization, and its financial activity has significantly declined in recent years. For the periods ending 2019 and 2020, the organization reported $0 in both revenue and expenses, maintaining static assets of $6,367. This lack of financial activity raises questions about its current operational status and program delivery. Historically, the organization had modest revenues, peaking at $137,365 in 2011 and $129,422 in 2014, with corresponding expenses. The sudden cessation of reported financial transactions in recent filings suggests either dormancy or a significant change in operations not reflected in the available data.
Given the $0 revenue and expenses in the latest filings, it's impossible to assess spending efficiency for those periods. For earlier periods, expenses generally tracked revenues, indicating that the organization was spending what it brought in. However, without a breakdown of expenses (program, administrative, fundraising) in the provided data, a detailed analysis of spending efficiency is not possible. The consistent reporting of $0 officer compensation across all filings suggests a volunteer-led or very lean operational structure, which can be a positive for efficiency if programs are still being delivered.
Transparency is generally good in terms of filing its IRS Form 990s, with 9 filings available. However, the lack of detailed financial activity in recent years, particularly the $0 revenue and expenses, makes it difficult to understand the organization's current impact or financial health. While the organization has consistently reported its assets and liabilities, the absence of operational data in the most recent filings limits a comprehensive assessment of its ongoing financial viability and programmatic effectiveness.