No reported liabilities, indicating financial stability in terms of debt
Clear mission focus on alumni support
Spending Breakdown
How Camelback High School Alumni Association allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Camelback High School Alumni Association
Is Camelback High School Alumni Association a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Camelback High School Alumni Association (EIN: 200604476) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 65/100. 3 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Camelback High School Alumni Association a good charity to donate to?
Camelback High School Alumni Association has a Mission Score of 65/100. Revenue: $10K. Assets: $3K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Camelback High School Alumni Association?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Camelback High School Alumni Association is 200604476. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Camelback High School Alumni Association spend its money?
Camelback High School Alumni Association allocates 80% to programs, 15% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Camelback High School Alumni Association's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Camelback High School Alumni Association's tax-exempt status using EIN 200604476 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Camelback High School Alumni Association appears to be a small, volunteer-run organization with limited financial activity. Their latest filing shows revenue of $10,087 against expenses of $14,446, indicating a deficit for the period. This follows a similar trend in the prior year (202212) where expenses also exceeded revenue. The organization's assets are modest, standing at $2,918, and they report no liabilities, suggesting a stable but very small financial base. The absence of officer compensation in both filings indicates a reliance on volunteer efforts, which is a positive sign for efficiency in a small nonprofit. However, the consistent spending exceeding revenue could be a concern if it continues without a clear plan for sustainability.
Given its small size and volunteer nature, the organization's financial health is inherently tied to its ability to raise funds for its specific alumni activities. The decline in revenue from $29,789 in 2022 to $10,087 in 2023 is a significant concern, representing a nearly 66% drop. This substantial decrease in funding, coupled with continued deficit spending, suggests potential challenges in maintaining operations or expanding programs. While transparency is good with zero officer compensation and no liabilities, the financial trend warrants close monitoring.
Spending efficiency is difficult to fully assess without a detailed breakdown of expenses, but the lack of paid officers suggests a high degree of volunteerism. The primary challenge appears to be revenue generation and ensuring expenses do not consistently outpace income. The organization's transparency is good in terms of compensation and liabilities, but the overall financial picture suggests a need for strategic planning around fundraising and expenditure management to ensure long-term viability.