Quick charity verification for Capital Facilities Foundation Inc (EIN: 202483538)
Verdict: Capital Facilities Foundation Inc appears trustworthy
75/100Mission Score
$567KRevenue
$20.5MAssets
3Red Flags
3Strengths
Red Flags
Significant historical volatility in revenue, with a negative revenue reported in 201506.
Large fluctuations in total assets, particularly the sharp decrease from $60M in 2017 to $14M in 2018, warranting further explanation.
High liabilities relative to assets, consistently representing a large portion of the balance sheet.
Strengths
Consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation, indicating low executive overhead.
Positive net income in recent years (e.g., $17,292 in 202306), suggesting operational sustainability.
Stable asset base around $20-21 million in the most recent filings after prior fluctuations.
Spending Breakdown
How Capital Facilities Foundation Inc allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Capital Facilities Foundation Inc
Is Capital Facilities Foundation Inc a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Capital Facilities Foundation Inc (EIN: 202483538) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 75/100. 3 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Capital Facilities Foundation Inc a good charity to donate to?
Capital Facilities Foundation Inc has a Mission Score of 75/100. Revenue: $567K. Assets: $20.5M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Capital Facilities Foundation Inc?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Capital Facilities Foundation Inc is 202483538. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Capital Facilities Foundation Inc spend its money?
Capital Facilities Foundation Inc allocates 80% to programs, 15% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Capital Facilities Foundation Inc's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Capital Facilities Foundation Inc's tax-exempt status using EIN 202483538 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Capital Facilities Foundation Inc. demonstrates a consistent operational pattern, with revenues generally aligning with or slightly exceeding expenses in recent years, such as the 202306 period where revenue was $579,889 against expenses of $562,597. The organization's assets have shown significant fluctuation over the past decade, peaking at over $60 million in 2017 before stabilizing around $20-21 million in the most recent filings. A notable aspect is the consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all available filings, which suggests either a volunteer-led executive structure or compensation being reported under other expense categories, warranting further investigation for complete transparency. The organization's financial health appears stable in the short term, but the substantial shifts in asset values and occasional revenue deficits (e.g., 201506) indicate a need for careful monitoring of long-term financial sustainability and asset management strategies.
Spending efficiency is difficult to fully assess without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses from the provided data. However, the consistent positive net income in recent years (e.g., $17,292 in 202306) suggests that the organization is generally operating within its means. The absence of reported officer compensation is a positive indicator for minimizing overhead, assuming other administrative costs are also kept in check. The organization's transparency regarding executive compensation is high, as it explicitly states 0% officer compensation in all filings, which is a strong point for donor confidence. However, a more granular breakdown of expenses would enhance the understanding of how funds are allocated across its mission-related activities versus overhead.