Is Cattaraugus Co Project Head Start Cattaragus And Wyoming Co Pr Legit?

Quick charity verification for Cattaraugus Co Project Head Start Cattaragus And Wyoming Co Pr (EIN: 161504738)

Verdict: Cattaraugus Co Project Head Start Cattaragus And Wyoming Co Pr appears trustworthy

80/100Mission Score
$5.3MRevenue
$1.2MAssets
2Red Flags
4Strengths

Red Flags

Strengths

AI Transparency Report

Cattaraugus Co Project Head Start Cattaragus And Wyoming Co Pr demonstrates consistent financial activity, with revenues and expenses generally in close alignment over the past decade. For instance, in 2023, expenses of $5,195,570 slightly exceeded revenues of $5,155,004, indicating a tight operating margin. The organization's assets have fluctuated, reaching a high of $1,426,987 in 2022 before decreasing to $999,670 in 2023, while liabilities have also seen variations. The consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all available filings suggests a strong commitment to directing funds towards its mission, or that executive compensation is reported under other categories, which would warrant further investigation for full transparency. Overall, the organization appears to manage its finances prudently given its operational scale. The organization's financial health appears stable, with sufficient assets to cover liabilities, as seen in 2023 where assets of $999,670 comfortably exceeded liabilities of $759,806. The consistent revenue generation, hovering around the $4-5 million mark annually, indicates a reliable funding base. While the NTEE code is unknown, the name 'Head Start' strongly implies a focus on early childhood education, a program area typically funded through government grants. The absence of reported officer compensation is a notable point for transparency, suggesting either a volunteer leadership structure or that compensation is categorized differently, which could impact a full understanding of administrative costs. Spending efficiency is difficult to fully assess without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses from the provided data. However, the close proximity of revenues and expenses year-over-year suggests that the organization is spending nearly all its income on its operations, which is common for service-delivery nonprofits. The lack of reported officer compensation is a positive indicator for efficiency if it means lower overhead, but without a full functional expense breakdown, a definitive conclusion on spending efficiency cannot be made. The organization's consistent filing of IRS 990s demonstrates a commitment to regulatory transparency.

View Full Transparency Report →

Disclaimer

AI-generated analysis based on IRS public records. Not financial or legal advice. Verify information directly with the organization.

Related Pages