No reported liabilities across all filings, demonstrating strong financial solvency
Positive net assets and surpluses in most recent years (e.g., $11,124 revenue vs $5,439 expenses in 2023)
High program spending ratio due to minimal administrative and fundraising costs
Spending Breakdown
How Cedergrove Affirms Real Effort allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
90%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Cedergrove Affirms Real Effort
Is Cedergrove Affirms Real Effort a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Cedergrove Affirms Real Effort (EIN: 200041053) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 2 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is Cedergrove Affirms Real Effort a good charity to donate to?
Cedergrove Affirms Real Effort has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $8K. Assets: $4K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Cedergrove Affirms Real Effort?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Cedergrove Affirms Real Effort is 200041053. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Cedergrove Affirms Real Effort spend its money?
Cedergrove Affirms Real Effort allocates 90% to programs, 10% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Cedergrove Affirms Real Effort's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Cedergrove Affirms Real Effort's tax-exempt status using EIN 200041053 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Cedergrove Affirms Real Effort demonstrates a consistent, albeit small, operational footprint. With revenues fluctuating between $0 and $11,124 over the past four years, and current assets at $4,264, the organization operates on a very modest scale. The absence of reported liabilities across all filings indicates sound financial management in terms of debt. The organization consistently reports 0% officer compensation, which is a strong indicator of volunteer-driven leadership and a commitment to directing all available funds towards its mission. This also suggests a high degree of transparency regarding compensation practices, as there are no complex executive pay structures to scrutinize.
Spending efficiency appears to be reasonable given the scale. For instance, in 2023, expenses were $5,439 against revenues of $11,124, leaving a healthy surplus. Similarly, in 2022, expenses were only $120 against $6,485 in revenue, indicating extremely low overhead or minimal program activity that year. The organization's small size inherently limits the complexity of its financial operations, which can contribute to a more straightforward and transparent financial picture. However, the low revenue and asset base mean its impact is likely localized and limited in scope.