Is Center For Alternative Sentencing And Employment Services Inc Legit?
Quick charity verification for Center For Alternative Sentencing And Employment Services Inc (EIN: 132668080)
Verdict: Center For Alternative Sentencing And Employment Services Inc appears trustworthy
75/100Mission Score
$58.9MRevenue
$39.0MAssets
2Red Flags
3Strengths
Red Flags
Recurring periods where expenses exceed revenue (e.g., 2023, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016)
Unusually low or 0% reported officer compensation for a large organization, potentially obscuring executive pay details.
Strengths
Significant growth in revenue and assets over the past decade, from $12.3 million revenue in 2014 to $53.5 million in 2023.
Strong asset base ($40.4 million in 2023) providing financial stability.
Consistent filing history with the IRS, indicating transparency in reporting.
Spending Breakdown
How Center For Alternative Sentencing And Employment Services Inc allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
85%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Center For Alternative Sentencing And Employment Services Inc
Is Center For Alternative Sentencing And Employment Services Inc a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Center For Alternative Sentencing And Employment Services Inc (EIN: 132668080) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 75/100. 2 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Center For Alternative Sentencing And Employment Services Inc a good charity to donate to?
Center For Alternative Sentencing And Employment Services Inc has a Mission Score of 75/100. Revenue: $58.9M. Assets: $39.0M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Center For Alternative Sentencing And Employment Services Inc?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Center For Alternative Sentencing And Employment Services Inc is 132668080. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Center For Alternative Sentencing And Employment Services Inc spend its money?
Center For Alternative Sentencing And Employment Services Inc allocates 85% to programs, 10% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Center For Alternative Sentencing And Employment Services Inc's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Center For Alternative Sentencing And Employment Services Inc's tax-exempt status using EIN 132668080 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Center For Alternative Sentencing And Employment Services Inc (CASES) demonstrates a consistent operational scale, with revenues fluctuating but generally increasing over the past decade, reaching $53.5 million in 2023. The organization's financial health appears stable, with assets of $40.4 million exceeding liabilities of $37.1 million in the latest filing, indicating a positive net asset position. However, the organization has frequently operated with expenses slightly exceeding revenue, as seen in 2023 where expenses were $54.9 million against $53.5 million in revenue, suggesting a reliance on prior year surpluses or other funding sources to cover operational gaps.
Spending efficiency is difficult to fully assess without a detailed functional expense breakdown, but the overall financial trend shows a large, active organization. The consistent reporting of 0% for officer compensation across all available filings is a significant point regarding transparency, as it suggests either no compensation is paid to officers or it is reported in a way that isn't captured by this specific metric, which warrants further investigation for a complete picture of executive remuneration.
Overall, CASES appears to be a large, established nonprofit with substantial financial activity. While its asset base has grown significantly, the recurring pattern of expenses slightly outpacing revenue in several periods suggests a need for careful financial management to maintain long-term sustainability. The lack of reported officer compensation is a notable data point that could be interpreted positively for resource allocation or as an area requiring more clarity.