How Central Maine United Soccer Club allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
90%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
5%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Central Maine United Soccer Club
Is Central Maine United Soccer Club a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Central Maine United Soccer Club (EIN: 10525264) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 0 red flags identified, 5 strengths noted.
Is Central Maine United Soccer Club a good charity to donate to?
Central Maine United Soccer Club has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $235K. Assets: $118K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Central Maine United Soccer Club?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Central Maine United Soccer Club is 10525264. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Central Maine United Soccer Club spend its money?
Central Maine United Soccer Club allocates 90% to programs, 5% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Central Maine United Soccer Club's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Central Maine United Soccer Club's tax-exempt status using EIN 10525264 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Central Maine United Soccer Club demonstrates consistent financial activity, with revenues fluctuating but generally showing growth over the past decade, from $89,986 in 2013 to $162,761 in 2022. The organization maintains a healthy asset base, growing from $29,214 in 2013 to $51,330 in 2022, with no reported liabilities, indicating strong financial solvency. While expenses have sometimes exceeded revenue, such as in 2022 where expenses were $168,700 against $162,761 in revenue, these deficits appear manageable and do not significantly erode assets.
The club's spending efficiency appears strong, particularly given the consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all filings, suggesting that resources are primarily directed towards its mission rather than executive salaries. The absence of liabilities further reinforces a prudent financial management approach. However, without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses, a precise assessment of spending efficiency is limited.
In terms of transparency, the organization has a consistent filing history with the IRS, providing regular financial updates. The lack of officer compensation is a positive indicator of a volunteer-driven or very lean operational structure. To further enhance transparency, a more granular breakdown of expenses beyond total expenses would be beneficial for stakeholders to understand how funds are allocated across different activities.