Zero liabilities in recent years (2019, 2020) demonstrate strong financial health.
Consistent revenue generation around $100,000 in recent periods.
Spending Breakdown
How Charle Keim Evangelisticassociation allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Charle Keim Evangelisticassociation
Is Charle Keim Evangelisticassociation a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Charle Keim Evangelisticassociation (EIN: 205359717) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 75/100. 1 red flag identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is Charle Keim Evangelisticassociation a good charity to donate to?
Charle Keim Evangelisticassociation has a Mission Score of 75/100. Revenue: $100K. Assets: $37K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Charle Keim Evangelisticassociation?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Charle Keim Evangelisticassociation is 205359717. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Charle Keim Evangelisticassociation spend its money?
Charle Keim Evangelisticassociation allocates 80% to programs, 10% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Charle Keim Evangelisticassociation's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Charle Keim Evangelisticassociation's tax-exempt status using EIN 205359717 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Charle Keim Evangelisticassociation demonstrates consistent financial activity, with revenues hovering around $100,000 in recent years. The organization appears to operate on a lean budget, with expenses closely tracking revenue, as seen in 2020 where revenues were $100,203 and expenses were $97,804. A notable strength is the complete absence of officer compensation reported across all available filings, suggesting that leadership is either volunteer-based or compensated through other means not disclosed as officer compensation, which can be a positive indicator for donor funds directly supporting programs. However, without a detailed breakdown of expenses beyond total expenses, it's challenging to fully assess spending efficiency across programs, administration, and fundraising. The organization's assets have fluctuated, showing a recent trend of lower asset levels compared to earlier years (e.g., $37,366 in 2020 vs. $99,066 in 2013), but liabilities have been consistently zero in the most recent periods, indicating good financial management in that regard. The lack of detailed expense categorization in the provided data limits a comprehensive assessment of spending efficiency and transparency beyond the high-level revenue and expense figures.