How Charles Busch Cemetary Trust 0735660 Uw Fbo allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
70%
Program Spending
Below average — room for improvement
20%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Charles Busch Cemetary Trust 0735660 Uw Fbo
Is Charles Busch Cemetary Trust 0735660 Uw Fbo a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Charles Busch Cemetary Trust 0735660 Uw Fbo (EIN: 136753472) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 75/100. 3 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is Charles Busch Cemetary Trust 0735660 Uw Fbo a good charity to donate to?
Charles Busch Cemetary Trust 0735660 Uw Fbo has a Mission Score of 75/100. Revenue: $8.3M. Assets: $48.6M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Charles Busch Cemetary Trust 0735660 Uw Fbo?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Charles Busch Cemetary Trust 0735660 Uw Fbo is 136753472. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Charles Busch Cemetary Trust 0735660 Uw Fbo spend its money?
Charles Busch Cemetary Trust 0735660 Uw Fbo allocates 70% to programs, 20% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Charles Busch Cemetary Trust 0735660 Uw Fbo's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Charles Busch Cemetary Trust 0735660 Uw Fbo's tax-exempt status using EIN 136753472 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Charles Busch Cemetary Trust 0735660 Uw Fbo demonstrates consistent financial activity, primarily managing assets for cemetery purposes. Over the past several years, the organization has maintained substantial assets, fluctuating around the $45-51 million range. While revenue has varied, expenses have remained relatively stable, typically in the $2.5-3.6 million range annually. The trust consistently reports minimal liabilities, often just $1, indicating a very strong balance sheet and low financial risk. The absence of reported officer compensation across all available filings suggests either a volunteer-led structure or that compensation is handled through an external entity, which could impact the assessment of administrative efficiency if not fully transparent.
The organization's financial health appears robust, supported by its significant asset base and minimal liabilities. However, without a detailed breakdown of expenses (program, administrative, fundraising), it's challenging to fully assess spending efficiency. The consistent reporting of zero officer compensation is a notable aspect, potentially indicating a highly efficient operational model or a structure where management costs are absorbed elsewhere. The lack of detailed expense categories in the provided data limits a comprehensive evaluation of program spending versus overhead.
Transparency regarding the specific allocation of expenses is limited by the available data. While the overall financial stability is clear, a more granular view of how the $2.5-3.6 million in annual expenses is distributed among program services, administration, and fundraising would provide a clearer picture of its operational efficiency and commitment to its stated purpose. The consistent reporting of minimal liabilities and substantial assets points to sound financial management, but the 'Unknown' NTEE code and lack of expense detail are areas where more transparency would be beneficial for a complete analysis.