Is Charles Strong Recreation Center Legit?

Quick charity verification for Charles Strong Recreation Center (EIN: 201566515)

Verdict: Charles Strong Recreation Center shows mixed signals

50/100Mission Score
$0Revenue
$0Assets
3Red Flags
2Strengths

Red Flags

Strengths

Spending Breakdown

How Charles Strong Recreation Center allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.

80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.

How to Interpret This Report

What Red Flags Mean

Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.

What Mission Score Measures

The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.

Using This Data for Donation Decisions

Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.

Frequently Asked Questions about Charles Strong Recreation Center

Is Charles Strong Recreation Center a legitimate charity?

Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Charles Strong Recreation Center (EIN: 201566515) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 50/100. 3 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.

Is Charles Strong Recreation Center a good charity to donate to?

Charles Strong Recreation Center has a Mission Score of 50/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.

What is the EIN for Charles Strong Recreation Center?

The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Charles Strong Recreation Center is 201566515. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.

What is a Mission Score?

The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.

How does Charles Strong Recreation Center spend its money?

Charles Strong Recreation Center allocates 80% to programs, 10% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.

How can I verify Charles Strong Recreation Center's tax-exempt status?

You can verify Charles Strong Recreation Center's tax-exempt status using EIN 201566515 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.

AI Transparency Report

The Charles Strong Recreation Center appears to be a very small, community-focused organization based on its financial filings. With revenues consistently in the low $40,000s and assets under $20,000, it operates on a modest scale. The organization reported $0 in revenue and assets in its latest filing, which could indicate a cessation of operations or a significant change in financial activity not immediately clear from the provided data. The lack of officer compensation in both reported periods suggests a volunteer-driven leadership model, which can be a positive indicator of efficiency for small nonprofits. Spending efficiency is difficult to fully assess without a detailed breakdown of expenses, but the organization did spend more than it brought in during the 201212 period ($49,073 expenses vs. $40,751 revenue), drawing down its assets. In the prior period (201112), it operated with a surplus ($42,750 revenue vs. $34,811 expenses). The significant drop to $0 revenue and assets in the latest period is a major concern regarding its ongoing viability and financial health. Transparency is generally good given the availability of filings, but the sudden financial decline warrants further investigation. Overall, while the historical data shows a small, active organization, the most recent filing of $0 revenue and assets raises serious questions about its current operational status and financial health. Without more recent or detailed information, it's challenging to confirm its continued existence or effectiveness.

View Full Transparency Report →

Disclaimer

AI-generated analysis based on IRS public records. Not financial or legal advice. Verify information directly with the organization.

Related Pages