Quick charity verification for Chelsea Alumni Association Inc (EIN: 202089765)
Verdict: Chelsea Alumni Association Inc appears trustworthy
70/100Mission Score
$0Revenue
$0Assets
1Red Flags
2Strengths
Red Flags
Zero revenue and assets in latest filing, indicating potential inactivity.
Strengths
No officer compensation reported, suggesting volunteer-driven operations.
No reported liabilities across all filings, indicating financial stability in prior periods.
Spending Breakdown
How Chelsea Alumni Association Inc allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
90%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Chelsea Alumni Association Inc
Is Chelsea Alumni Association Inc a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Chelsea Alumni Association Inc (EIN: 202089765) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 70/100. 1 red flag identified, 2 strengths noted.
Is Chelsea Alumni Association Inc a good charity to donate to?
Chelsea Alumni Association Inc has a Mission Score of 70/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Chelsea Alumni Association Inc?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Chelsea Alumni Association Inc is 202089765. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Chelsea Alumni Association Inc spend its money?
Chelsea Alumni Association Inc allocates 90% to programs, 10% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Chelsea Alumni Association Inc's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Chelsea Alumni Association Inc's tax-exempt status using EIN 202089765 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Chelsea Alumni Association Inc appears to be a very small, volunteer-run organization based on its financial filings. With zero revenue and assets reported in its latest filing, and relatively low revenue in prior years ($12,561 in 2012 and $21,363 in 2011), it likely operates with minimal overhead. The absence of reported officer compensation across all filings suggests a high degree of volunteerism, which is a positive indicator for a small nonprofit. However, the lack of recent financial activity (zero revenue and assets) raises questions about its current operational status or if it's in a dormant phase. Transparency is good given the available data, with clear reporting of no liabilities.