Is Child Advocacy Team Legit?

Spending Breakdown

How Child Advocacy Team allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.

90%

Program Spending

Healthy — majority goes to mission

10%

Admin Costs

Reasonable — admin costs in check

Fundraising

Within typical range

How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.

How to Interpret This Report

What Red Flags Mean

Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.

What Mission Score Measures

The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.

Using This Data for Donation Decisions

Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.

Frequently Asked Questions about Child Advocacy Team

Is Child Advocacy Team a legitimate charity?

Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Child Advocacy Team (EIN: 200906621) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 2 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.

Is Child Advocacy Team a good charity to donate to?

Child Advocacy Team has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $653K. Assets: $2K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.

What is the EIN for Child Advocacy Team?

The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Child Advocacy Team is 200906621. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.

What is a Mission Score?

The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.

How does Child Advocacy Team spend its money?

Child Advocacy Team allocates 90% to programs, 10% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.

How can I verify Child Advocacy Team's tax-exempt status?

You can verify Child Advocacy Team's tax-exempt status using EIN 200906621 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.

AI Transparency Report

Child Advocacy Team demonstrates consistent operational activity with revenues and expenses closely matched over the past decade, indicating a stable, albeit tight, financial model. For example, in 2023, revenue was $641,861 against expenses of $640,861. The organization's asset base is notably low, with the latest reported assets at $2,380 and a peak of $17,094 in 2015, suggesting minimal reserves or capital investments. This low asset base, especially relative to its annual revenue exceeding $600,000, could indicate a reliance on immediate funding for operations.

The organization consistently reports 0% officer compensation across all available filings, which is a significant indicator of volunteer-led or very lean administrative overhead. This practice, while potentially maximizing funds for programs, also raises questions about the sustainability of leadership without compensation, or if key personnel are compensated through other means not captured as 'officer compensation'. The consistent filing of IRS Form 990s over 15 periods demonstrates a commitment to regulatory transparency.

Given the NTEE code P20 (Child Advocacy Organizations), the lack of significant assets and the tight revenue-expense margins suggest that nearly all incoming funds are directly expended on their mission-related activities. While this indicates high program efficiency, the lack of a substantial financial cushion could pose risks during unexpected funding shortfalls or operational challenges.

Verdict: Child Advocacy Team appears trustworthy

Red Flags

Strengths