Quick charity verification for Children's Winter Garden (EIN: 20354984)
Verdict: Children's Winter Garden has notable concerns
30/100Mission Score
$0Revenue
$0Assets
3Red Flags
1Strengths
Red Flags
Consistent deficit spending during active years (e.g., $146,362 revenue vs. $158,431 expenses in 2015)
Decline in assets over time, indicating financial instability
Current status shows $0 revenue and assets, suggesting organizational failure or closure.
Strengths
Reported 0% officer compensation, indicating no executive salaries were paid.
Spending Breakdown
How Children's Winter Garden allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
70%
Program Spending
Below average — room for improvement
20%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Children's Winter Garden
Is Children's Winter Garden a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Children's Winter Garden (EIN: 20354984) has notable concerns. Mission Score: 30/100. 3 red flags identified, 1 strength noted.
Is Children's Winter Garden a good charity to donate to?
Children's Winter Garden has a Mission Score of 30/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Children's Winter Garden?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Children's Winter Garden is 20354984. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Children's Winter Garden spend its money?
Children's Winter Garden allocates 70% to programs, 20% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Children's Winter Garden's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Children's Winter Garden's tax-exempt status using EIN 20354984 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Children's Winter Garden appears to be a very small organization that has ceased operations. The latest filing shows $0 in revenue and assets, indicating it is no longer active. In its active years (2011-2015), the organization consistently spent more than it brought in, leading to a steady decline in assets from $115,838 in 2011 to $48,372 in 2015. This trend of deficit spending suggests financial instability during its operational period. The organization consistently reported 0% officer compensation, which is a positive sign for donor trust, but the overall financial health was weak due to persistent operating losses.