Is Chisholm Trail Heritage Center Association Legit?
Quick charity verification for Chisholm Trail Heritage Center Association (EIN: 141896825)
Verdict: Chisholm Trail Heritage Center Association appears trustworthy
85/100Mission Score
$314KRevenue
$377KAssets
1Red Flags
5Strengths
Red Flags
Lack of detailed functional expense breakdown in provided summary data
Strengths
Consistent 0% officer compensation
Significant revenue growth in recent years (e.g., $245,541 in 2023 vs. $117,404 in 2022)
Substantial increase in assets (from $61,574 in 2022 to $190,150 in 2023)
Positive net income in most recent filing ($245,541 revenue vs. $120,738 expenses in 2023)
Long history of IRS 990 filings demonstrating transparency
Spending Breakdown
How Chisholm Trail Heritage Center Association allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Chisholm Trail Heritage Center Association
Is Chisholm Trail Heritage Center Association a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Chisholm Trail Heritage Center Association (EIN: 141896825) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 1 red flag identified, 5 strengths noted.
Is Chisholm Trail Heritage Center Association a good charity to donate to?
Chisholm Trail Heritage Center Association has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $314K. Assets: $377K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Chisholm Trail Heritage Center Association?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Chisholm Trail Heritage Center Association is 141896825. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Chisholm Trail Heritage Center Association spend its money?
Chisholm Trail Heritage Center Association allocates 80% to programs, 15% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Chisholm Trail Heritage Center Association's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Chisholm Trail Heritage Center Association's tax-exempt status using EIN 141896825 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Chisholm Trail Heritage Center Association demonstrates a generally stable financial position, with recent growth in revenue and assets. In the 2023 fiscal period, the organization reported revenues of $245,541 against expenses of $120,738, resulting in a significant surplus that contributed to an increase in assets to $190,150. This marks a substantial improvement from previous years, where revenues and expenses were more closely matched, and assets were considerably lower. The organization consistently reports 0% officer compensation, indicating a volunteer-led or very lean executive structure, which can be a positive sign for donor confidence regarding administrative overhead.
While the overall financial health appears to be improving, a detailed breakdown of spending efficiency (program vs. administrative vs. fundraising) is not explicitly provided in the summary data. However, the consistent lack of officer compensation suggests a focus on minimizing executive overhead. The organization's NTEE code (A11 - Historical Societies and Related Activities) aligns with its mission, and the growth in assets could indicate successful fundraising or efficient management of resources to support its heritage preservation goals. Further analysis of their functional expense breakdown would provide a clearer picture of their spending efficiency.
Transparency is generally good given the availability of 13 years of IRS 990 filings. The consistent reporting of key financial metrics allows for a longitudinal analysis of their financial trends. The absence of officer compensation is a transparent indicator of how leadership is compensated, or rather, not compensated, from the organization's funds. To further enhance transparency, a more detailed public breakdown of program spending versus other expenses would be beneficial.