Is Chouteau Mazie Leadership & Academic Support For Students Legit?
Quick charity verification for Chouteau Mazie Leadership & Academic Support For Students (EIN: 200381937)
Verdict: Chouteau Mazie Leadership & Academic Support For Students appears trustworthy
85/100Mission Score
$94KRevenue
$873KAssets
1Red Flags
5Strengths
Red Flags
Extremely low expenses relative to revenue and assets, potentially indicating limited direct program spending or an unclear operational model for program delivery.
Strengths
Strong financial health with consistent asset growth, increasing from $518,675 in 2014 to $793,142 in 2023.
Exceptional spending efficiency, with expenses consistently representing a very small fraction of revenue (e.g., $7,188 expenses vs. $70,159 revenue in 2023).
Zero liabilities reported across all filing periods, indicating a very stable financial position.
No officer compensation reported, demonstrating a commitment to directing all funds towards the organization's mission or asset growth.
Consistent IRS 990 filing history, indicating good transparency and compliance.
Spending Breakdown
How Chouteau Mazie Leadership & Academic Support For Students allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
90%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Chouteau Mazie Leadership & Academic Support For Students
Is Chouteau Mazie Leadership & Academic Support For Students a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Chouteau Mazie Leadership & Academic Support For Students (EIN: 200381937) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 1 red flag identified, 5 strengths noted.
Is Chouteau Mazie Leadership & Academic Support For Students a good charity to donate to?
Chouteau Mazie Leadership & Academic Support For Students has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $94K. Assets: $873K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Chouteau Mazie Leadership & Academic Support For Students?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Chouteau Mazie Leadership & Academic Support For Students is 200381937. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Chouteau Mazie Leadership & Academic Support For Students spend its money?
Chouteau Mazie Leadership & Academic Support For Students allocates 90% to programs, 10% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Chouteau Mazie Leadership & Academic Support For Students's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Chouteau Mazie Leadership & Academic Support For Students's tax-exempt status using EIN 200381937 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Chouteau Mazie Leadership & Academic Support For Students demonstrates strong financial health with consistently growing assets and a very low expense ratio. In 2023, the organization reported $70,159 in revenue against only $7,188 in expenses, indicating a significant surplus that contributes to its asset growth. The organization's assets have steadily increased from $518,675 in 2014 to $793,142 in 2023, showing excellent financial stewardship and accumulation of resources. The absence of liabilities across all reported periods further underscores its robust financial position.
The spending efficiency is exceptionally high, with expenses consistently representing a very small fraction of revenue. For instance, in 2023, expenses were less than 11% of revenue. This suggests that the vast majority of funds received are either retained for future programs or directly contribute to asset growth, rather than being consumed by operational costs. The organization's transparency is commendable, with a consistent filing history and clear reporting of zero officer compensation, which enhances public trust.
However, the extremely low expense figures, particularly in relation to the organization's stated mission of 'Leadership & Academic Support For Students,' raise questions about the actual scale and nature of program activities. While financial health is strong, the minimal expenses could imply limited direct program spending, or that programs are delivered with exceptionally low overhead, which would be a positive. Further detail on how the accumulated assets are utilized for program delivery would provide a more complete picture of its impact.