Minimal liabilities ($0 or $1) across all reported periods, demonstrating a very healthy balance sheet.
Consistent revenue generation, often in the multi-million dollar range, indicating ongoing donor support or investment income.
Spending Breakdown
How Christy And John Mack Foundation allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
85%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Christy And John Mack Foundation
Is Christy And John Mack Foundation a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Christy And John Mack Foundation (EIN: 133746731) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 75/100. 2 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Christy And John Mack Foundation a good charity to donate to?
Christy And John Mack Foundation has a Mission Score of 75/100. Revenue: $8.1M. Assets: $2.4M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Christy And John Mack Foundation?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Christy And John Mack Foundation is 133746731. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Christy And John Mack Foundation spend its money?
Christy And John Mack Foundation allocates 85% to programs, 10% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Christy And John Mack Foundation's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Christy And John Mack Foundation's tax-exempt status using EIN 133746731 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Christy And John Mack Foundation demonstrates consistent financial activity, with revenues fluctuating between approximately $2 million and $16.6 million over the past decade. The organization consistently reports zero officer compensation, which is a positive indicator for donor confidence as it suggests that leadership is not drawing a salary from the foundation's funds. However, the provided data lacks a detailed breakdown of expenses into program, administrative, and fundraising categories, making a precise assessment of spending efficiency challenging. While the foundation's assets have seen a significant decrease from a high of $19.5 million in 2011 to $2.6 million in 2023, its liabilities consistently remain at $0 or $1, indicating a very healthy balance sheet with minimal debt. Without a detailed functional expense statement, it's difficult to fully evaluate how effectively the organization is deploying its resources towards its mission.