Is City Cultural Commission Legit?

Quick charity verification for City Cultural Commission (EIN: 161665547)

Verdict: City Cultural Commission appears trustworthy

70/100Mission Score
$313Revenue
$51KAssets
2Red Flags
3Strengths

Red Flags

Strengths

Spending Breakdown

How City Cultural Commission allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.

85%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.

How to Interpret This Report

What Red Flags Mean

Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.

What Mission Score Measures

The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.

Using This Data for Donation Decisions

Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.

Frequently Asked Questions about City Cultural Commission

Is City Cultural Commission a legitimate charity?

Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, City Cultural Commission (EIN: 161665547) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 70/100. 2 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.

Is City Cultural Commission a good charity to donate to?

City Cultural Commission has a Mission Score of 70/100. Revenue: $313. Assets: $51K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.

What is the EIN for City Cultural Commission?

The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for City Cultural Commission is 161665547. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.

What is a Mission Score?

The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.

How does City Cultural Commission spend its money?

City Cultural Commission allocates 85% to programs, 10% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.

How can I verify City Cultural Commission's tax-exempt status?

You can verify City Cultural Commission's tax-exempt status using EIN 161665547 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.

AI Transparency Report

The City Cultural Commission demonstrates a fluctuating financial history, with recent revenue significantly lower than historical figures. The latest reported revenue is only $313, a stark contrast to $67,121 in 2018 and $35,390 in 2017. While the organization has maintained assets, currently at $50,989, its operational funding appears to have diminished considerably. The consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all available filings indicates a commitment to volunteer leadership or very low administrative overhead in this area, which is a positive sign for donor confidence regarding executive pay. Given the minimal latest revenue, it's challenging to assess current spending efficiency accurately. However, historical data shows periods where expenses exceeded revenue, such as in 2017 ($39,280 expenses vs. $35,390 revenue) and 2014 ($18,986 expenses vs. $7,625 revenue), suggesting reliance on reserves or prior year funding. The organization has consistently filed its IRS 990s, indicating a commitment to regulatory transparency, even with the dramatic drop in recent financial activity. Overall, the organization's financial health appears to be in a precarious state based on the latest revenue figures, despite a history of more substantial activity and a healthy asset base. Further investigation would be needed to understand the cause of the recent revenue decline and its impact on program delivery.

View Full Transparency Report →

Disclaimer

AI-generated analysis based on IRS public records. Not financial or legal advice. Verify information directly with the organization.

Related Pages