Stable financial operations over many years, consistently managing large capital flows for CUNY.
Clear mission focus on construction and capital improvements for higher education, as implied by its name and NTEE code.
Spending Breakdown
How City University Construction Fund allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
99%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
1%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about City University Construction Fund
Is City University Construction Fund a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, City University Construction Fund (EIN: 132587538) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 90/100. 1 red flag identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is City University Construction Fund a good charity to donate to?
City University Construction Fund has a Mission Score of 90/100. Revenue: $1.3B. Assets: $61.2M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for City University Construction Fund?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for City University Construction Fund is 132587538. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does City University Construction Fund spend its money?
City University Construction Fund allocates 99% to programs, 1% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify City University Construction Fund's tax-exempt status?
You can verify City University Construction Fund's tax-exempt status using EIN 132587538 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The City University Construction Fund (CUCF) demonstrates a unique financial profile, primarily acting as a pass-through entity for significant construction and capital improvement funds for the City University of New York (CUNY). Its revenue and expenses consistently align very closely, as seen in the 202306 filing where both were $1,313,013,404, indicating that nearly all incoming funds are immediately disbursed for their intended purpose. This operational model suggests high spending efficiency in terms of direct program delivery, as there is minimal accumulation of assets relative to its massive revenue. The organization consistently reports 0% officer compensation across all available filings, which is a strong indicator of fiscal prudence regarding executive pay and contributes positively to its transparency and public trust. However, the nature of its operations as a funding conduit means traditional metrics of 'program spending' versus 'administrative' or 'fundraising' might not apply in the same way as a direct service charity, as its primary function is financial management and disbursement.