Is Cjm Foundation Legit?

Spending Breakdown

How Cjm Foundation allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.

75%

Program Spending

Healthy — majority goes to mission

15%

Admin Costs

Reasonable — admin costs in check

10%

Fundraising

Within typical range

How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.

How to Interpret This Report

What Red Flags Mean

Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.

What Mission Score Measures

The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.

Using This Data for Donation Decisions

Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.

Frequently Asked Questions about Cjm Foundation

Is Cjm Foundation a legitimate charity?

Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Cjm Foundation (EIN: 137105559) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 70/100. 3 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.

Is Cjm Foundation a good charity to donate to?

Cjm Foundation has a Mission Score of 70/100. Revenue: $2.5M. Assets: $6.3M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.

What is the EIN for Cjm Foundation?

The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Cjm Foundation is 137105559. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.

What is a Mission Score?

The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.

How does Cjm Foundation spend its money?

Cjm Foundation allocates 75% to programs, 15% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.

How can I verify Cjm Foundation's tax-exempt status?

You can verify Cjm Foundation's tax-exempt status using EIN 137105559 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.

AI Transparency Report

Cjm Foundation demonstrates a mixed financial picture. While the organization has consistently reported zero officer compensation across all available filings, indicating strong transparency regarding executive pay, its financial health shows some volatility. In recent years, expenses have frequently exceeded revenue, as seen in 2023 ($2,512,279 expenses vs. $2,439,247 revenue) and 2022 ($2,623,858 expenses vs. $2,261,226 revenue). This trend of operating at a deficit could be a concern if it continues long-term, potentially drawing down its assets, which have decreased from $12,768,562 in 2011 to $6,320,935 currently. The significant drop in revenue in 2021 to $343,570, while expenses remained over $1 million, is particularly notable.

The organization's spending efficiency cannot be fully assessed without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses, which are not provided in the summary data. However, the consistent reporting of zero officer compensation is a positive indicator of responsible use of funds at the executive level. The overall decline in assets over the past decade, despite periods of higher revenue, suggests that the organization has been spending more than it brings in for extended periods, which warrants closer examination of its operational model and sustainability.

Verdict: Cjm Foundation appears trustworthy

Red Flags

Strengths