Quick charity verification for Clia Alaska (EIN: 208664605)
Verdict: Clia Alaska shows mixed signals
65/100Mission Score
$1.0MRevenue
$344KAssets
3Red Flags
3Strengths
Red Flags
Significant deficit in the latest reported period (201612), with expenses exceeding revenue by $655,474.
Substantial decrease in assets from $1,156,567 in 2015 to $344,486 in 2016.
Increase in liabilities from $185,473 in 2016, up from $342,080 in 2015 (Note: Liabilities decreased from 2015 to 2016, but the overall financial position worsened due to asset decline and deficit).
Strengths
Consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all filings, indicating low executive overhead.
Historically strong revenue generation, generally exceeding $1 million annually prior to the 2016 deficit.
Long operational history with 7 IRS 990 filings, suggesting established presence.
Spending Breakdown
How Clia Alaska allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
75%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Clia Alaska
Is Clia Alaska a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Clia Alaska (EIN: 208664605) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 65/100. 3 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Clia Alaska a good charity to donate to?
Clia Alaska has a Mission Score of 65/100. Revenue: $1.0M. Assets: $344K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Clia Alaska?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Clia Alaska is 208664605. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Clia Alaska spend its money?
Clia Alaska allocates 75% to programs, 15% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Clia Alaska's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Clia Alaska's tax-exempt status using EIN 208664605 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Clia Alaska demonstrates a consistent operational history with revenues generally exceeding $1 million annually, though the latest filing (201612) shows a significant deficit where expenses ($1,701,195) substantially outpaced revenue ($1,045,721). This resulted in a notable decrease in assets from $1,156,567 in 2015 to $344,486 in 2016, and an increase in liabilities. The organization's financial health appears to have weakened in the most recent reported period, moving from a surplus in 2015 to a substantial deficit.
Spending efficiency cannot be fully assessed without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses, which are not provided in the summary data. However, the consistent lack of reported officer compensation across all filings suggests a commitment to minimizing overhead in that specific area. The organization's transparency regarding executive compensation is excellent, as it consistently reports 0% officer compensation.
The significant drop in assets and the large deficit in the latest filing warrant closer examination to understand the underlying causes and the organization's plan for financial recovery. While the historical trend shows generally stable operations, the most recent period presents a concerning financial picture.