Is Clinton Association For A Renewed Environment Inc Legit?
Quick charity verification for Clinton Association For A Renewed Environment Inc (EIN: 133479722)
Verdict: Clinton Association For A Renewed Environment Inc appears trustworthy
80/100Mission Score
$1.9MRevenue
$12.0MAssets
2Red Flags
4Strengths
Red Flags
Consistent operational deficits (e.g., $1,928,170 expenses vs. $1,799,312 revenue in 202302)
Increasing liabilities over time (from $1,106,169 in 201402 to $3,038,957 in 202302)
Strengths
Substantial and stable asset base (consistently over $10 million)
0% officer compensation reported across all filings, indicating high resource allocation to mission
Consistent IRS 990 filing history (13 filings) demonstrating transparency and compliance
Strong financial foundation with significant assets to weather short-term deficits
Spending Breakdown
How Clinton Association For A Renewed Environment Inc allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
85%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Clinton Association For A Renewed Environment Inc
Is Clinton Association For A Renewed Environment Inc a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Clinton Association For A Renewed Environment Inc (EIN: 133479722) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 80/100. 2 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is Clinton Association For A Renewed Environment Inc a good charity to donate to?
Clinton Association For A Renewed Environment Inc has a Mission Score of 80/100. Revenue: $1.9M. Assets: $12.0M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Clinton Association For A Renewed Environment Inc?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Clinton Association For A Renewed Environment Inc is 133479722. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Clinton Association For A Renewed Environment Inc spend its money?
Clinton Association For A Renewed Environment Inc allocates 85% to programs, 10% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Clinton Association For A Renewed Environment Inc's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Clinton Association For A Renewed Environment Inc's tax-exempt status using EIN 133479722 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Clinton Association For A Renewed Environment Inc (CARE) demonstrates consistent financial activity, with revenues and expenses generally in the range of $1.3 million to $2.2 million over the past decade. The organization maintains substantial assets, consistently above $10 million, indicating a strong financial foundation. However, CARE has consistently operated with expenses exceeding revenues in recent years, as seen in the 202302 period where expenses were $1,928,170 against revenues of $1,799,312, and similarly in 202202 with expenses of $2,117,831 against revenues of $1,851,052. This trend of deficit spending, while not immediately critical given their asset base, warrants attention for long-term sustainability.
The organization's transparency is bolstered by the consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all available filings, which is a positive indicator of resource allocation directly to the mission rather than executive salaries. While specific program spending ratios are not detailed in the provided summary, the absence of officer compensation suggests a lean operational structure. The consistent filing of IRS Form 990s over 13 periods further demonstrates a commitment to regulatory compliance and public disclosure.
Overall, CARE appears to be a financially stable organization with a strong asset base and a commendable approach to executive compensation. The primary area for improvement lies in addressing the recurring operational deficits to ensure long-term financial health and avoid drawing down on reserves unnecessarily. Further analysis of their program efficiency would require a deeper dive into their functional expense breakdown.