Significant fluctuation in assets over time, from $1,035,198 in 202106 to $364,519 currently, without clear explanation.
Unknown NTEE code, which limits ability to benchmark and understand core mission.
Strengths
Zero reported officer compensation across all filings, indicating a volunteer-led or highly cost-efficient leadership structure.
Long filing history (14 filings), suggesting consistent compliance with IRS reporting requirements.
Spending Breakdown
How Cloister Inn Of Princeton University allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
85%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Cloister Inn Of Princeton University
Is Cloister Inn Of Princeton University a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Cloister Inn Of Princeton University (EIN: 210427400) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 60/100. 3 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.
Is Cloister Inn Of Princeton University a good charity to donate to?
Cloister Inn Of Princeton University has a Mission Score of 60/100. Revenue: $808K. Assets: $365K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Cloister Inn Of Princeton University?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Cloister Inn Of Princeton University is 210427400. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Cloister Inn Of Princeton University spend its money?
Cloister Inn Of Princeton University allocates 85% to programs, 15% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Cloister Inn Of Princeton University's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Cloister Inn Of Princeton University's tax-exempt status using EIN 210427400 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Cloister Inn Of Princeton University exhibits a fluctuating financial performance over the past several years. While the organization reported revenue of $808,132 in its latest filing, its expenses have frequently exceeded revenue, as seen in 202406 ($970,399 expenses vs. $872,045 revenue) and 202306 ($1,010,660 expenses vs. $709,427 revenue). This consistent deficit spending could indicate a reliance on reserves or other funding sources to cover operational costs, which is not sustainable long-term without a clear strategy for increasing revenue or reducing expenses.
The organization's assets have also shown significant variability, from a high of $1,035,198 in 202106 to $364,519 currently. The absence of reported officer compensation across all filings suggests a volunteer-led or very lean administrative structure, which can be a positive indicator of efficiency. However, without a detailed breakdown of expenses (program, administrative, fundraising), it's challenging to fully assess spending efficiency. The lack of an NTEE code also limits the ability to benchmark against similar organizations.
Overall, while the lack of executive compensation is a positive sign for transparency regarding leadership costs, the recurring operational deficits and fluctuating asset base warrant closer examination. The organization's financial health appears somewhat unstable, with expenses frequently outpacing revenue, which could pose challenges for its long-term viability if not addressed.