Is Coalition To Abolish Slavery & Trafficking Legit?
Quick charity verification for Coalition To Abolish Slavery & Trafficking (EIN: 100008533)
Verdict: Coalition To Abolish Slavery & Trafficking appears trustworthy
88/100Mission Score
$7.5MRevenue
$8.4MAssets
2Red Flags
5Strengths
Red Flags
Reported 0% officer compensation across all filings is highly unusual and may warrant further investigation into how executive compensation is categorized.
Experienced a significant deficit in 2023 ($1.28M), though this followed a strong surplus year.
Strengths
Consistent and significant revenue growth over the past decade, from $2.7M in 2014 to $6.5M in 2023.
Strong and growing asset base, reaching over $8.1M in 2023, indicating financial health.
Likely high program spending efficiency, given the nature of the organization and absence of high reported administrative costs.
History of managing liabilities effectively relative to assets.
Strong financial performance in recent years, including a $1.3M surplus in 2022.
Spending Breakdown
How Coalition To Abolish Slavery & Trafficking allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
85%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Coalition To Abolish Slavery & Trafficking
Is Coalition To Abolish Slavery & Trafficking a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Coalition To Abolish Slavery & Trafficking (EIN: 100008533) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 88/100. 2 red flags identified, 5 strengths noted.
Is Coalition To Abolish Slavery & Trafficking a good charity to donate to?
Coalition To Abolish Slavery & Trafficking has a Mission Score of 88/100. Revenue: $7.5M. Assets: $8.4M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Coalition To Abolish Slavery & Trafficking?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Coalition To Abolish Slavery & Trafficking is 100008533. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Coalition To Abolish Slavery & Trafficking spend its money?
Coalition To Abolish Slavery & Trafficking allocates 85% to programs, 10% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Coalition To Abolish Slavery & Trafficking's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Coalition To Abolish Slavery & Trafficking's tax-exempt status using EIN 100008533 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Coalition To Abolish Slavery & Trafficking (CAST) demonstrates a generally sound financial position, with consistent revenue growth over the past decade, increasing from $2.7 million in 2014 to over $6.5 million in 2023. While the organization experienced a deficit in 2023, with expenses exceeding revenue by approximately $1.28 million, this follows a strong surplus in 2022. Their asset base has also grown significantly, reaching over $8.1 million in 2023, indicating a healthy accumulation of resources to support their mission. The consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all available filings suggests a high degree of transparency regarding executive pay, or that executive compensation is not reported in a way that is captured by this metric, which warrants further investigation.
Spending efficiency appears to be robust, with a significant portion of expenses likely directed towards program services, given the nature of their mission and the absence of high administrative or fundraising costs indicated by the 0% officer compensation. The organization's ability to manage its liabilities, which have fluctuated but remained manageable relative to assets, further supports its financial stability. The growth in both revenue and assets over time suggests effective fundraising and financial management.
Overall, CAST appears to be a financially stable organization with a strong commitment to its mission, as evidenced by its growth and consistent financial reporting. The lack of reported officer compensation across all filings is a notable point for transparency, suggesting either very low or no compensation for officers, or a reporting method that doesn't capture it in this specific field, which is a positive indicator for donor confidence if the former, but requires clarification if the latter.