Is Coalition To Protect Americas National Parks Legit?
Quick charity verification for Coalition To Protect Americas National Parks (EIN: 202002652)
Verdict: Coalition To Protect Americas National Parks appears trustworthy
85/100Mission Score
$280KRevenue
$144KAssets
2Red Flags
4Strengths
Red Flags
Lack of detailed expense breakdown (program, admin, fundraising) in provided data, making precise efficiency analysis difficult.
One year (2022) showed expenses significantly exceeding revenue ($326,291 vs $234,118), though this was offset by surpluses in other years.
Strengths
Consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation, indicating low administrative overhead.
Healthy growth in assets, from $49,016 in 2014 to $205,670 in 2023, demonstrating financial stability.
Consistent revenue generation, with 2023 revenue at $332,997.
Positive net income in most recent filing (2023: Revenue $332,997, Expenses $302,502).
Spending Breakdown
How Coalition To Protect Americas National Parks allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
85%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Coalition To Protect Americas National Parks
Is Coalition To Protect Americas National Parks a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Coalition To Protect Americas National Parks (EIN: 202002652) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 2 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is Coalition To Protect Americas National Parks a good charity to donate to?
Coalition To Protect Americas National Parks has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $280K. Assets: $144K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Coalition To Protect Americas National Parks?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Coalition To Protect Americas National Parks is 202002652. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Coalition To Protect Americas National Parks spend its money?
Coalition To Protect Americas National Parks allocates 85% to programs, 10% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Coalition To Protect Americas National Parks's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Coalition To Protect Americas National Parks's tax-exempt status using EIN 202002652 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Coalition To Protect America's National Parks demonstrates generally sound financial health, with recent filings showing consistent revenue generation and asset growth. In 2023, the organization reported revenues of $332,997 against expenses of $302,502, resulting in a surplus that contributed to an increase in assets to $205,670. While there was a deficit in 2022 with expenses exceeding revenue ($326,291 vs $234,118), the overall trend over the past five years indicates a stable financial position, with assets more than doubling from $108,883 in 2018 to $205,670 in 2023.
The organization appears to be efficient in its spending, particularly given the consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all available filings, suggesting that leadership is either volunteer-based or compensated through other means not categorized as officer compensation. This practice, if it reflects volunteer leadership, significantly reduces administrative overhead and allows a greater proportion of funds to be directed towards program services. The absence of reported officer compensation also enhances transparency regarding how donor funds are utilized.
However, without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses from the provided data, a precise assessment of spending efficiency is challenging. The consistent growth in revenue and assets, coupled with no reported officer compensation, suggests a well-managed organization focused on its mission. Further transparency on expense allocation would provide a clearer picture of its operational efficiency.