Quick charity verification for Coastal Studies For Girls (EIN: 141920541)
Verdict: Coastal Studies For Girls has notable concerns
20/100Mission Score
$0Revenue
$0Assets
3Red Flags
1Strengths
Red Flags
Latest filing shows $0 revenue and assets, indicating potential cessation of operations.
Consistent operating deficits in most years (e.g., $604,874 expenses vs. $491,312 revenue in 2017).
Significant decline in assets over time, from $1,599,249 in 2011 to $0 in the latest filing.
Strengths
No reported officer compensation, potentially indicating volunteer leadership or efficient use of funds for executive roles during its active years.
Spending Breakdown
How Coastal Studies For Girls allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
75%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Coastal Studies For Girls
Is Coastal Studies For Girls a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Coastal Studies For Girls (EIN: 141920541) has notable concerns. Mission Score: 20/100. 3 red flags identified, 1 strength noted.
Is Coastal Studies For Girls a good charity to donate to?
Coastal Studies For Girls has a Mission Score of 20/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Coastal Studies For Girls?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Coastal Studies For Girls is 141920541. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Coastal Studies For Girls spend its money?
Coastal Studies For Girls allocates 75% to programs, 15% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Coastal Studies For Girls's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Coastal Studies For Girls's tax-exempt status using EIN 141920541 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Coastal Studies For Girls appears to be in a state of financial decline, as evidenced by its latest reported revenue and assets of $0. This indicates a potential cessation of operations or a significant restructuring. Historically, the organization consistently operated with deficits, with expenses exceeding revenue in most years, such as in 2017 where expenses were $604,874 against revenues of $491,312. This trend of spending more than it earned, except for a notable surplus in 2015, suggests a reliance on accumulated assets or external funding to cover operational costs.
The organization's financial health has been precarious, with a consistent draw-down on assets over the years, from $1,599,249 in 2011 to $1,297,787 in 2017, before reaching $0. The lack of reported officer compensation across all filings suggests either a volunteer-led executive team or that compensation was reported under different categories, which could impact transparency regarding leadership costs. The sudden drop to zero revenue and assets in the latest filing is a critical concern for its financial viability and future operations.
Given the latest filing showing $0 in revenue and assets, the organization's spending efficiency and program delivery are currently non-existent. For its active years, without a detailed breakdown of expenses (program, administrative, fundraising) from the provided data, it's challenging to fully assess spending efficiency. However, the consistent operating deficits indicate that the organization was not financially self-sustaining through its revenue streams alone.