Historically, the organization had a substantial revenue base, exceeding $3 million annually, suggesting a capacity for fundraising and program delivery in the past.
Spending Breakdown
How Collaborative Arts Project 21 Inc allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
75%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Collaborative Arts Project 21 Inc
Is Collaborative Arts Project 21 Inc a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Collaborative Arts Project 21 Inc (EIN: 133735969) has notable concerns. Mission Score: 30/100. 5 red flags identified, 1 strength noted.
Is Collaborative Arts Project 21 Inc a good charity to donate to?
Collaborative Arts Project 21 Inc has a Mission Score of 30/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Collaborative Arts Project 21 Inc?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Collaborative Arts Project 21 Inc is 133735969. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Collaborative Arts Project 21 Inc spend its money?
Collaborative Arts Project 21 Inc allocates 75% to programs, 15% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Collaborative Arts Project 21 Inc's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Collaborative Arts Project 21 Inc's tax-exempt status using EIN 133735969 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Collaborative Arts Project 21 Inc (CAP21) appears to be in a precarious financial position, as indicated by its latest filing showing $0 in revenue and assets. This is a significant decline from previous years where revenue consistently exceeded $3 million. Over the past five years, the organization has consistently spent more than it brought in, with expenses exceeding revenue by approximately $700,000 to $900,000 annually. This persistent deficit spending has led to a concerning accumulation of liabilities, which grew from $2.27 million in 2011 to $5.26 million in 2015, significantly outweighing its assets. The lack of recent financial activity and the historical trend of operating at a loss raise serious questions about its ongoing viability and financial health. The organization's transparency is somewhat limited by the absence of recent detailed financial data, making it difficult to assess current operational efficiency or program impact.