How Committee To Protect Journalists Inc allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
75%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Committee To Protect Journalists Inc
Is Committee To Protect Journalists Inc a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Committee To Protect Journalists Inc (EIN: 133081500) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 2 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is Committee To Protect Journalists Inc a good charity to donate to?
Committee To Protect Journalists Inc has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $13.8M. Assets: $38.4M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Committee To Protect Journalists Inc?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Committee To Protect Journalists Inc is 133081500. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Committee To Protect Journalists Inc spend its money?
Committee To Protect Journalists Inc allocates 75% to programs, 15% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Committee To Protect Journalists Inc's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Committee To Protect Journalists Inc's tax-exempt status using EIN 133081500 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Committee To Protect Journalists Inc. demonstrates a generally stable financial position with significant asset growth over the past decade, from $16.8 million in 2015 to $38.3 million in 2023. While the organization experienced a slight deficit in 2022 and 2023 (expenses exceeding revenue by $870,458 and $618,128 respectively), its substantial asset base provides a strong buffer. The organization's revenue has fluctuated, peaking at over $17.8 million in 2020, indicating a capacity for significant fundraising. The consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all available filings suggests a commitment to transparency regarding executive pay, or that compensation is reported differently, which warrants further investigation.
Spending efficiency appears reasonable, though specific program, administrative, and fundraising breakdowns are not provided in the summary data. However, the consistent growth in assets alongside increasing expenses suggests a well-managed organization capable of sustaining its operations. The organization's NTEE code (R200 - Journalism & Publishing) aligns with its mission, and its long filing history indicates consistent compliance with IRS reporting requirements, contributing to its overall transparency. The recent deficits, while not alarming given the asset base, are a trend to monitor.