Significant revenue volatility (e.g., $97,584 in 2022 vs. $664,838 in 2021)
Strengths
Substantial asset base providing financial stability (latest assets: $4,687,123)
No reported officer compensation, indicating low administrative overhead for leadership
Consistent IRS 990 filing history demonstrating transparency
Very low liabilities across all reported periods (mostly $0 or $1)
Spending Breakdown
How Constans Culver Foundation allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
85%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Constans Culver Foundation
Is Constans Culver Foundation a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Constans Culver Foundation (EIN: 136048059) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 75/100. 2 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is Constans Culver Foundation a good charity to donate to?
Constans Culver Foundation has a Mission Score of 75/100. Revenue: $2.1M. Assets: $4.7M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Constans Culver Foundation?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Constans Culver Foundation is 136048059. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Constans Culver Foundation spend its money?
Constans Culver Foundation allocates 85% to programs, 10% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Constans Culver Foundation's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Constans Culver Foundation's tax-exempt status using EIN 136048059 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Constans Culver Foundation demonstrates consistent financial stability with substantial assets, averaging around $4.7 million over the past decade. However, recent years show a trend where expenses have exceeded revenue, particularly in 2023 ($400,866 expenses vs. $334,131 revenue) and 2022 ($394,638 expenses vs. $97,584 revenue). This suggests the organization is drawing down on its asset base to cover operational costs, which, while sustainable in the short term given its asset size, warrants monitoring for long-term viability. The foundation's transparency is bolstered by its consistent filing of IRS Form 990s, and the absence of reported officer compensation indicates a lean administrative structure, potentially relying on volunteer leadership or external management without direct compensation to officers.
Spending efficiency is difficult to fully assess without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses within the provided data. However, the consistent expense levels, generally in the $300,000-$400,000 range annually, against fluctuating revenues, indicate a stable operational footprint. The lack of officer compensation is a positive indicator for minimizing administrative overhead. To fully evaluate efficiency, a deeper dive into how the $300k-$400k in annual expenses are allocated across program delivery versus administrative and fundraising activities would be necessary. The foundation's substantial asset base provides a strong financial cushion, allowing it to continue its mission even during periods of lower revenue generation.