Limited financial data available (only one filing)
No recent financial activity reported for the latest period summary
Strengths
No officer compensation reported (0% of expenses in 2019)
Positive net assets ($6,964 in 2019) with no liabilities
Low expenses relative to revenue in 2019 ($13,528 expenses vs. $20,491 revenue)
Spending Breakdown
How Conway Springs Developmentfoundation Inc allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Conway Springs Developmentfoundation Inc
Is Conway Springs Developmentfoundation Inc a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Conway Springs Developmentfoundation Inc (EIN: 208559972) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 75/100. 2 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Conway Springs Developmentfoundation Inc a good charity to donate to?
Conway Springs Developmentfoundation Inc has a Mission Score of 75/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Conway Springs Developmentfoundation Inc?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Conway Springs Developmentfoundation Inc is 208559972. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Conway Springs Developmentfoundation Inc spend its money?
Conway Springs Developmentfoundation Inc allocates 80% to programs, 15% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Conway Springs Developmentfoundation Inc's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Conway Springs Developmentfoundation Inc's tax-exempt status using EIN 208559972 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Conway Springs Developmentfoundation Inc appears to be a very small organization with limited financial activity. In its latest reported period (201912), it generated $20,491 in revenue and incurred $13,528 in expenses, resulting in a modest surplus. Its assets were $6,964 with no reported liabilities, indicating a stable, albeit small, financial position. The organization reported 0% of its expenses going to officer compensation, which is a positive indicator for donor confidence regarding executive pay.
Given the limited data (only one filing available), a comprehensive assessment of long-term financial health and spending efficiency is challenging. However, the absence of liabilities and the positive net assets suggest responsible financial management for an organization of its size. Transparency is moderate, with a single 990 filing available, but the lack of more recent data limits current insights.