Liabilities significantly exceed assets (e.g., $1.5M liabilities vs. $0.8M assets in 2023)
Declining asset base over the past decade (from $1.18M in 2014 to $0.85M in 2023)
No reported officer compensation, which could indicate a lack of transparency or unusual operational structure.
Strengths
Consistent revenue generation, albeit at a level below expenses
Long filing history (14 filings) indicating consistent reporting
Spending Breakdown
How Cookson Hills Properties Inc allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
70%
Program Spending
Below average — room for improvement
20%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Cookson Hills Properties Inc
Is Cookson Hills Properties Inc a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Cookson Hills Properties Inc (EIN: 200050836) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 45/100. 4 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.
Is Cookson Hills Properties Inc a good charity to donate to?
Cookson Hills Properties Inc has a Mission Score of 45/100. Revenue: $142K. Assets: $835K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Cookson Hills Properties Inc?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Cookson Hills Properties Inc is 200050836. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Cookson Hills Properties Inc spend its money?
Cookson Hills Properties Inc allocates 70% to programs, 20% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Cookson Hills Properties Inc's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Cookson Hills Properties Inc's tax-exempt status using EIN 200050836 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Cookson Hills Properties Inc. appears to be a small organization with consistent revenue and expenses over the past decade. The organization consistently spends more than it brings in, as evidenced by expenses exceeding revenue in every reported period (e.g., $171,316 expenses vs. $131,143 revenue in 2023). This consistent deficit spending has led to a gradual decline in assets, from $1,187,860 in 2014 to $858,940 in 2023. A significant concern is the high level of liabilities, consistently over $1.5 million, which far exceeds its assets. This indicates a precarious financial position where liabilities are nearly double its assets in recent years (e.g., $1,524,378 liabilities vs. $858,940 assets in 2023). The organization's NTEE code L22 suggests it is involved in housing and shelter, which often involves property management. The lack of reported officer compensation across all filings suggests either a fully volunteer board or that compensation is reported under other expense categories, which could impact transparency regarding leadership costs. Given the consistent operating deficits and high liabilities relative to assets, the organization's long-term financial sustainability is questionable.