Is Council For Global Immigration Legit?

Quick charity verification for Council For Global Immigration (EIN: 132781857)

Verdict: Council For Global Immigration shows mixed signals

40/100Mission Score
$0Revenue
$0Assets
3Red Flags
3Strengths

Red Flags

Strengths

Spending Breakdown

How Council For Global Immigration allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.

75%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.

How to Interpret This Report

What Red Flags Mean

Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.

What Mission Score Measures

The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.

Using This Data for Donation Decisions

Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.

Frequently Asked Questions about Council For Global Immigration

Is Council For Global Immigration a legitimate charity?

Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Council For Global Immigration (EIN: 132781857) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 40/100. 3 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.

Is Council For Global Immigration a good charity to donate to?

Council For Global Immigration has a Mission Score of 40/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.

What is the EIN for Council For Global Immigration?

The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Council For Global Immigration is 132781857. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.

What is a Mission Score?

The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.

How does Council For Global Immigration spend its money?

Council For Global Immigration allocates 75% to programs, 15% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.

How can I verify Council For Global Immigration's tax-exempt status?

You can verify Council For Global Immigration's tax-exempt status using EIN 132781857 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.

AI Transparency Report

The Council For Global Immigration appears to have ceased operations, as indicated by its latest filing showing $0 in revenue and assets. Prior to this, the organization demonstrated a fluctuating financial performance. In 2017, it reported a deficit with expenses ($2,855,981) exceeding revenue ($2,324,630), continuing a trend from 2016 where expenses ($2,869,589) also surpassed revenue ($2,540,866). However, in earlier years like 2015 and 2014, the organization consistently generated surpluses, with revenue significantly exceeding expenses. The absence of reported officer compensation across all available filings suggests either a volunteer-led executive team or that compensation was reported under different categories, which could impact transparency regarding leadership costs. The organization's asset base grew steadily from $1,379,509 in 2010 to a peak of $4,870,309 in 2015, before declining to $4,276,248 in 2017. Liabilities also saw an increase over time, peaking at $1,170,291 in 2016. The sudden drop to $0 in revenue and assets in the latest period strongly suggests a dissolution or merger, which would warrant further investigation for stakeholders. Without detailed expense breakdowns (program, administrative, fundraising), a precise assessment of spending efficiency is challenging, but the consistent lack of reported officer compensation is a notable aspect of its financial reporting.

View Full Transparency Report →

Disclaimer

AI-generated analysis based on IRS public records. Not financial or legal advice. Verify information directly with the organization.

Related Pages