Is Council On Accreditation Of Svs For…

Quick charity verification for Council On Accreditation Of Svs For (EIN: 132905215)

Spending Breakdown

How Council On Accreditation Of Svs For allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.

85%

Program Spending

Healthy — majority goes to mission

10%

Admin Costs

Reasonable — admin costs in check

Fundraising

Within typical range

How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.

How to Interpret This Report

What Red Flags Mean

Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.

What Mission Score Measures

The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.

Using This Data for Donation Decisions

Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.

Frequently Asked Questions about Council On Accreditation Of Svs For

Is Council On Accreditation Of Svs For a legitimate charity?

Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Council On Accreditation Of Svs For (EIN: 132905215) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 90/100. 1 red flag identified, 4 strengths noted.

Is Council On Accreditation Of Svs For a good charity to donate to?

Council On Accreditation Of Svs For has a Mission Score of 90/100. Revenue: $12.9M. Assets: $16.2M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.

What is the EIN for Council On Accreditation Of Svs For?

The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Council On Accreditation Of Svs For is 132905215. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.

What is a Mission Score?

The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.

How does Council On Accreditation Of Svs For spend its money?

Council On Accreditation Of Svs For allocates 85% to programs, 10% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.

How can I verify Council On Accreditation Of Svs For's tax-exempt status?

You can verify Council On Accreditation Of Svs For's tax-exempt status using EIN 132905215 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.

AI Transparency Report

The Council On Accreditation Of Svs For demonstrates consistent financial operations over the past decade, with revenues generally exceeding or closely matching expenses. For instance, in 2020, revenues were $7,562,550 against expenses of $8,069,865, indicating a slight deficit, while in 2019, expenses of $10,233,937 exceeded revenues of $8,948,671. However, the organization maintains a healthy asset base, with assets consistently above $12 million and reaching $16,177,570 in the latest period, suggesting financial stability despite occasional operational deficits. The consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all available filings indicates a high degree of transparency regarding executive pay, as it implies that no compensation was reported for officers, directors, trustees, or key employees on Part VII of the Form 990, or that such compensation was negligible or covered by other entities. This practice enhances trust and accountability.

The organization's financial health appears stable, with a strong asset base providing a buffer against operational fluctuations. While some years show expenses slightly exceeding revenue, the overall trend suggests prudent management. The absence of reported officer compensation is a significant positive indicator for transparency and efficient use of funds, as it suggests resources are not being disproportionately allocated to executive salaries. This consistent reporting across multiple years reinforces a commitment to minimizing administrative overhead related to top leadership compensation.

Overall, the Council On Accreditation Of Svs For exhibits a financially sound profile with a strong commitment to transparency, particularly concerning executive compensation. The organization's ability to maintain substantial assets despite varying annual revenues and expenses points to a resilient financial strategy. The consistent 0% officer compensation is a notable strength, indicating that the organization's leadership is not drawing direct compensation from the reported figures, which can be a strong positive for donor confidence and public perception of financial stewardship.

Is Council On Accreditation Of Svs For Legit?

Verdict: Council On Accreditation Of Svs For appears trustworthy

Red Flags

Strengths