Consistent deficit spending from 2011 to 2015 (e.g., 2015 expenses $679,031 vs. revenue $532,283).
Significant increase in liabilities from $57,562 in 2011 to $568,537 in 2015.
Declining asset base from $871,094 in 2011 to $766,269 in 2015.
Strengths
No officer compensation reported across all historical filings, indicating efficient use of funds regarding executive pay.
Spending Breakdown
How Crmc Children's Center allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
75%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Crmc Children's Center
Is Crmc Children's Center a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Crmc Children's Center (EIN: 201287159) has notable concerns. Mission Score: 30/100. 4 red flags identified, 1 strength noted.
Is Crmc Children's Center a good charity to donate to?
Crmc Children's Center has a Mission Score of 30/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Crmc Children's Center?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Crmc Children's Center is 201287159. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Crmc Children's Center spend its money?
Crmc Children's Center allocates 75% to programs, 15% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Crmc Children's Center's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Crmc Children's Center's tax-exempt status using EIN 201287159 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Crmc Children's Center consistently reported zero revenue and assets in its latest filing, which is a significant discrepancy given its historical financial activity. This raises immediate concerns about the accuracy and completeness of its most recent public disclosures. Historically, the organization operated with revenues consistently around $500,000 to $550,000 and expenses in the $620,000 to $690,000 range, indicating a pattern of spending exceeding revenue. The consistent decline in assets from $871,094 in 2011 to $766,269 in 2015, coupled with a substantial increase in liabilities from $57,562 to $568,537 over the same period, suggests a deteriorating financial position. The lack of officer compensation reported across all historical filings is a positive note regarding executive pay, but the overall financial health appears to have been in decline even before the latest filing's zero figures.
The organization's spending efficiency cannot be fully assessed without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses, which are not provided in the summary data. However, the consistent deficit spending (expenses exceeding revenue) from 2011 to 2015 is a red flag for financial sustainability. The latest filing's complete absence of financial data makes it impossible to evaluate current operations or transparency, as it provides no meaningful information for analysis. This lack of current data severely impacts the ability to assess its financial health and operational integrity.