Liabilities frequently exceed assets (e.g., $38,412 liabilities vs. $18,577 assets in 2024)
Declining asset base over the past decade (from $63,079 in 2015 to $18,577 in 2024)
Small and fluctuating revenue base, limiting capacity for growth or reserves
Strengths
Zero officer compensation, indicating efficient use of funds for non-executive purposes
Long history of IRS 990 filings (13 filings), demonstrating consistent reporting
Relatively stable revenue stream, albeit small, over the past decade
Spending Breakdown
How Cross Country Ski Areas Association allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Cross Country Ski Areas Association
Is Cross Country Ski Areas Association a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Cross Country Ski Areas Association (EIN: 20345467) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 65/100. 4 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Cross Country Ski Areas Association a good charity to donate to?
Cross Country Ski Areas Association has a Mission Score of 65/100. Revenue: $128K. Assets: $28K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Cross Country Ski Areas Association?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Cross Country Ski Areas Association is 20345467. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Cross Country Ski Areas Association spend its money?
Cross Country Ski Areas Association allocates 80% to programs, 15% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Cross Country Ski Areas Association's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Cross Country Ski Areas Association's tax-exempt status using EIN 20345467 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Cross Country Ski Areas Association operates on a relatively small scale, with recent annual revenues hovering around $100,000-$130,000. The organization consistently reports zero officer compensation, which is a positive indicator of resource allocation directly to operations rather than executive salaries. However, the organization frequently spends more than it brings in, as seen in fiscal year 2024 where expenses of $117,937 exceeded revenue of $114,284, and in 2022 where expenses of $105,217 exceeded revenue of $94,680. This trend of deficit spending, coupled with liabilities often exceeding assets (e.g., $38,412 in liabilities vs. $18,577 in assets in 2024), suggests potential financial instability and a reliance on future funding or drawing down limited reserves. While the lack of officer compensation is good for transparency, the overall financial health appears precarious due to consistent operating deficits and a weak balance sheet.