Long history of IRS 990 filings (10 filings), indicating transparency and compliance.
Spending Breakdown
How Crosswicks Foundation Ltd allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
20%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Crosswicks Foundation Ltd
Is Crosswicks Foundation Ltd a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Crosswicks Foundation Ltd (EIN: 132732197) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 2 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Crosswicks Foundation Ltd a good charity to donate to?
Crosswicks Foundation Ltd has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $433K. Assets: $2.6M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Crosswicks Foundation Ltd?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Crosswicks Foundation Ltd is 132732197. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Crosswicks Foundation Ltd spend its money?
Crosswicks Foundation Ltd allocates 80% to programs, 20% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Crosswicks Foundation Ltd's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Crosswicks Foundation Ltd's tax-exempt status using EIN 132732197 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Crosswicks Foundation Ltd appears to be a grant-making organization with a consistent asset base around $2.5 million to $2.8 million over the past decade. While its revenue fluctuates, expenses have remained relatively stable, typically in the range of $190,000 to $220,000 annually. The organization consistently reports 0% officer compensation, which is a positive indicator of efficient use of funds for its stated purpose, assuming its operations are managed by volunteers or through other compensated staff not classified as officers. The latest filing shows a significant deficit, with expenses of $187,998 against revenue of $68,337, indicating reliance on its substantial asset base or prior year surpluses. Without detailed program spending breakdowns, it's challenging to fully assess spending efficiency, but the lack of officer compensation suggests a lean administrative structure at the top.