Quick charity verification for Crucible Project (EIN: 203918105)
Verdict: Crucible Project appears trustworthy
85/100Mission Score
$1.4MRevenue
$303KAssets
2Red Flags
4Strengths
Red Flags
Occasional deficit spending (e.g., 202306 expenses exceeded revenue by $95,451)
Increasing liabilities over time, reaching $278,407 in 202406
Strengths
Consistent revenue growth over the past decade, from $441,917 in 201506 to $1,296,845 in 202406
No reported officer compensation, indicating efficient use of funds or volunteer leadership
Significant growth in assets over time, from $90,577 in 201506 to $413,364 in 202406
Generally positive net income in recent years (e.g., $107,848 surplus in 202406)
Spending Breakdown
How Crucible Project allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Crucible Project
Is Crucible Project a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Crucible Project (EIN: 203918105) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 2 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is Crucible Project a good charity to donate to?
Crucible Project has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $1.4M. Assets: $303K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Crucible Project?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Crucible Project is 203918105. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Crucible Project spend its money?
Crucible Project allocates 80% to programs, 15% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Crucible Project's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Crucible Project's tax-exempt status using EIN 203918105 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Crucible Project demonstrates consistent operational activity with revenues generally exceeding expenses in recent years, indicating a stable financial position. For example, in the 202406 period, revenue was $1,296,845 against expenses of $1,188,997. However, there have been periods of deficit spending, such as in 202306 where expenses ($1,177,813) exceeded revenue ($1,082,362). The organization's assets have fluctuated but show a general upward trend over the long term, from $90,577 in 201506 to $413,364 in 202406, suggesting growth in its financial base.
Spending efficiency appears reasonable, with no reported officer compensation, which can be a positive indicator of resources being directed towards programs rather than executive salaries. The organization's liabilities have also increased over time, reaching $278,407 in 202406, which warrants monitoring relative to its assets.
Transparency is high regarding executive compensation, as 0% officer compensation is consistently reported across all available filings. This indicates that the organization is either volunteer-led at the executive level or compensates its leadership through other means not categorized as officer compensation on the 990, which would require further investigation for complete transparency.