How Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Group Return For The Chapters allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
80%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Group Return For The Chapters
Is Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Group Return For The Chapters a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Group Return For The Chapters (EIN: 136161105) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 75/100. 2 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.
Is Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Group Return For The Chapters a good charity to donate to?
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Group Return For The Chapters has a Mission Score of 75/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Group Return For The Chapters?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Group Return For The Chapters is 136161105. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Group Return For The Chapters spend its money?
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Group Return For The Chapters allocates 80% to programs, 10% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Group Return For The Chapters's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Group Return For The Chapters's tax-exempt status using EIN 136161105 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (CFF) demonstrates consistent financial activity with revenues closely matching expenses across all reported periods, indicating a balanced operational budget. For instance, in 2014, both revenue and expenses were $118,825,354. This pattern suggests that the organization is effectively utilizing its incoming funds for its programs and operations without accumulating significant surpluses or deficits. However, the reported zero assets and liabilities across all filings are unusual for an organization of this scale and may indicate that these filings represent a specific operational segment or a consolidated group return where assets and liabilities are reported at a different level, or that the provided data is incomplete regarding the full financial picture. The consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all filings is also noteworthy; while it could indicate that executive compensation is reported elsewhere or is not a direct expense of this specific entity, it warrants further investigation for a complete understanding of the organization's compensation practices. Without more detailed breakdowns of expenses, it's challenging to fully assess spending efficiency, but the revenue-to-expense parity is a positive sign of fiscal management.