How Daniel And Sharon Bowen Foundation allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
90%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
8%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
2%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Daniel And Sharon Bowen Foundation
Is Daniel And Sharon Bowen Foundation a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Daniel And Sharon Bowen Foundation (EIN: 205984891) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 2 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is Daniel And Sharon Bowen Foundation a good charity to donate to?
Daniel And Sharon Bowen Foundation has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $2.3M. Assets: $16.3M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Daniel And Sharon Bowen Foundation?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Daniel And Sharon Bowen Foundation is 205984891. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Daniel And Sharon Bowen Foundation spend its money?
Daniel And Sharon Bowen Foundation allocates 90% to programs, 8% to administration, and 2% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Daniel And Sharon Bowen Foundation's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Daniel And Sharon Bowen Foundation's tax-exempt status using EIN 205984891 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Daniel And Sharon Bowen Foundation exhibits a highly variable financial performance over the past decade, with significant fluctuations in revenue. For instance, revenue swung from a high of $20,776,902 in 2021 to negative figures of $-833,354 in 2023 and $-456,287 in 2022. Despite these revenue swings, the organization consistently maintains substantial assets, reaching $17,724,797 in 2023, indicating a strong endowment or investment base. Expenses have been relatively stable, generally ranging between $1 million and $1.5 million in recent years, suggesting consistent operational costs regardless of revenue. The foundation's liabilities are consistently reported as minimal ($1), which is a positive indicator of financial stability and low debt burden.
Regarding spending efficiency, without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses, it's challenging to fully assess. However, the consistent expenses against fluctuating revenue, especially in years with negative revenue, suggest that the foundation is drawing from its assets to cover operational costs and grantmaking. The absence of reported officer compensation is a strong positive for transparency and efficiency, indicating that leadership is either unpaid or compensated through other means not reported as officer compensation on the 990, which is common for private foundations. The foundation's NTEE code T20 (Private Grantmaking Foundations) suggests its primary activity is grantmaking, which typically involves a high proportion of program spending.
Overall, the foundation appears financially robust due to its substantial assets and minimal liabilities. The lack of officer compensation enhances its transparency and perceived efficiency. However, the extreme volatility in reported revenue, particularly the negative figures in recent years, warrants closer examination to understand the underlying financial activities, such as investment losses or specific accounting practices for private foundations.