Is Daniel M Neidich And Brooke Garber Foundation Legit?
Quick charity verification for Daniel M Neidich And Brooke Garber Foundation (EIN: 133318126)
Verdict: Daniel M Neidich And Brooke Garber Foundation appears trustworthy
85/100Mission Score
$2.5MRevenue
$352KAssets
3Red Flags
3Strengths
Red Flags
Significant year-over-year fluctuations in assets and revenue, which could indicate unpredictable funding or large, infrequent distributions.
Lack of detailed expense breakdown (program, admin, fundraising) in the provided data, hindering a precise assessment of spending efficiency.
Unknown NTEE code makes it difficult to benchmark against peer organizations.
Strengths
Consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation, indicating no executive salaries are paid from the foundation's funds.
Generally low liabilities (often $1), suggesting a healthy balance sheet and minimal debt.
Revenues have frequently exceeded expenses in recent years, contributing to financial stability.
Spending Breakdown
How Daniel M Neidich And Brooke Garber Foundation allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
90%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
5%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Daniel M Neidich And Brooke Garber Foundation
Is Daniel M Neidich And Brooke Garber Foundation a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Daniel M Neidich And Brooke Garber Foundation (EIN: 133318126) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 3 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Daniel M Neidich And Brooke Garber Foundation a good charity to donate to?
Daniel M Neidich And Brooke Garber Foundation has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $2.5M. Assets: $352K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Daniel M Neidich And Brooke Garber Foundation?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Daniel M Neidich And Brooke Garber Foundation is 133318126. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Daniel M Neidich And Brooke Garber Foundation spend its money?
Daniel M Neidich And Brooke Garber Foundation allocates 90% to programs, 5% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Daniel M Neidich And Brooke Garber Foundation's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Daniel M Neidich And Brooke Garber Foundation's tax-exempt status using EIN 133318126 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Daniel M Neidich And Brooke Garber Foundation demonstrates consistent financial activity, with revenues fluctuating significantly year-to-year, ranging from a low of $699,608 in 2012 to a high of $4,965,629 in 2020. Expenses have also varied, but generally remain below revenue, indicating a build-up of assets over time, though assets have seen a notable decline from a peak of $2,569,661 in 2012 to $491,485 in 2024. The foundation consistently reports zero officer compensation, which is a positive indicator for donor confidence as it suggests resources are not being diverted to executive salaries. However, without a detailed breakdown of expenses into program, administrative, and fundraising categories, a precise assessment of spending efficiency is challenging. The consistent reporting of minimal liabilities (often $1) suggests a healthy balance sheet with low debt. The lack of an NTEE code makes it difficult to benchmark against similar organizations, impacting a full transparency assessment.
While the foundation's financial health appears stable with revenues generally exceeding expenses in recent years, the significant fluctuation in assets and revenue warrants closer examination. For example, assets decreased from $1,025,191 in 2021 to $315,638 in 2023 before rebounding to $491,485 in 2024. This volatility, coupled with the absence of detailed expense categorization in the provided data, limits a comprehensive evaluation of its spending efficiency. The consistent reporting of zero officer compensation is a strong point for transparency regarding executive pay, but a more granular view of how funds are allocated across different activities would enhance understanding of its operational effectiveness and program focus.