Consistent negative net income, with expenses exceeding revenue in all reported periods.
Latest filing shows $0 in both revenue and assets, indicating potential cessation of operations or severe financial distress.
Lack of detailed spending breakdown makes it difficult to assess program efficiency and administrative overhead.
Strengths
No reported officer compensation, suggesting a volunteer-driven model and efficient use of funds in that regard.
Historically maintained a modest asset base, though this has now depleted.
Spending Breakdown
How Dansville Hosp Uw Whh allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
70%
Program Spending
Below average — room for improvement
20%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Dansville Hosp Uw Whh
Is Dansville Hosp Uw Whh a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Dansville Hosp Uw Whh (EIN: 166022898) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 40/100. 3 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.
Is Dansville Hosp Uw Whh a good charity to donate to?
Dansville Hosp Uw Whh has a Mission Score of 40/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Dansville Hosp Uw Whh?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Dansville Hosp Uw Whh is 166022898. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Dansville Hosp Uw Whh spend its money?
Dansville Hosp Uw Whh allocates 70% to programs, 20% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Dansville Hosp Uw Whh's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Dansville Hosp Uw Whh's tax-exempt status using EIN 166022898 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Dansville Hosp Uw Whh appears to be a very small organization, as indicated by its consistently low revenue and assets over the past five years, with the latest filing showing $0 in both. The organization has consistently spent more than it has brought in, with expenses exceeding revenue in all reported periods (e.g., $7,842 expenses vs. $5,131 revenue in 2015). This trend suggests a reliance on existing assets or prior funding, which is concerning given the current $0 asset declaration. The lack of officer compensation reported across all filings suggests a volunteer-run or very lean operational structure, which can be a positive for efficiency but also raises questions about the sustainability of operations without dedicated paid leadership, especially with the current financial state. The organization's transparency is limited by the lack of detailed spending breakdowns in the provided data, making it difficult to assess program efficiency.