Quick charity verification for Dayton Proctor Park Association (EIN: 10845299)
Verdict: Dayton Proctor Park Association has notable concerns
30/100Mission Score
$0Revenue
$0Assets
2Red Flags
2Strengths
Red Flags
Zero revenue and assets reported, making financial analysis impossible
Lack of financial transparency due to absence of monetary data
Strengths
No reported executive compensation, suggesting volunteer leadership
No reported administrative or fundraising costs, indicating no overhead if operations are entirely in-kind
Spending Breakdown
How Dayton Proctor Park Association allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
0%
Program Spending
Concerning — less than half to programs
0%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Dayton Proctor Park Association
Is Dayton Proctor Park Association a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Dayton Proctor Park Association (EIN: 10845299) has notable concerns. Mission Score: 30/100. 2 red flags identified, 2 strengths noted.
Is Dayton Proctor Park Association a good charity to donate to?
Dayton Proctor Park Association has a Mission Score of 30/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Dayton Proctor Park Association?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Dayton Proctor Park Association is 10845299. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Dayton Proctor Park Association spend its money?
Dayton Proctor Park Association allocates 0% to programs, 0% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Dayton Proctor Park Association's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Dayton Proctor Park Association's tax-exempt status using EIN 10845299 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Dayton Proctor Park Association appears to be a very small, likely volunteer-run organization, given its reported zero revenue and zero assets. This indicates either a nascent stage of operation, a period of inactivity, or that its financial activities are extremely minimal and potentially not fully captured in standard IRS filings if it operates on an entirely in-kind or cash-basis without formal banking. Without any financial activity, it's impossible to assess spending efficiency or financial health in a traditional sense. Transparency is limited by the lack of financial data, as there are no monetary transactions to report or analyze. Further investigation would be needed to understand how the park is maintained and supported if not through reported financial means.