Latest filing shows $0 revenue and assets, indicating potential dormancy or cessation of activities.
NTEE code is unknown, which can hinder understanding of its specific mission and comparative analysis.
Strengths
Consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation, indicating efficient use of funds for leadership.
Historically low expenses relative to assets, suggesting fiscal conservatism.
Maintained significant assets in prior years, potentially providing a stable base for future activities.
Spending Breakdown
How Deerfield Heritage Inc allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
75%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
15%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Deerfield Heritage Inc
Is Deerfield Heritage Inc a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Deerfield Heritage Inc (EIN: 208087235) shows mixed signals. Mission Score: 65/100. 2 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Deerfield Heritage Inc a good charity to donate to?
Deerfield Heritage Inc has a Mission Score of 65/100. Revenue: $0. Assets: $0. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Deerfield Heritage Inc?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Deerfield Heritage Inc is 208087235. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Deerfield Heritage Inc spend its money?
Deerfield Heritage Inc allocates 75% to programs, 15% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Deerfield Heritage Inc's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Deerfield Heritage Inc's tax-exempt status using EIN 208087235 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Deerfield Heritage Inc. appears to be a very small organization with minimal financial activity, as indicated by its latest reported revenue and assets of $0. However, historical filings show some level of operation. For instance, in 2014, the organization reported revenue of $12,485 and expenses of $7,359, with substantial assets of $635,258. The consistent reporting of zero officer compensation across all available filings suggests a volunteer-led or very lean operational structure. The significant assets relative to the low revenue and expenses in prior years could indicate a focus on asset preservation or a specific project that is not revenue-generating in the traditional sense. The lack of detailed expense breakdowns in the provided data makes it difficult to fully assess spending efficiency, but the low overall expenses in prior years suggest a conservative approach to spending.