How Delaware Sec Chapter Of The Sigma Phi Epsilon Fraternity allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
90%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Delaware Sec Chapter Of The Sigma Phi Epsilon Fraternity
Is Delaware Sec Chapter Of The Sigma Phi Epsilon Fraternity a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Delaware Sec Chapter Of The Sigma Phi Epsilon Fraternity (EIN: 200874442) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 70/100. 2 red flags identified, 3 strengths noted.
Is Delaware Sec Chapter Of The Sigma Phi Epsilon Fraternity a good charity to donate to?
Delaware Sec Chapter Of The Sigma Phi Epsilon Fraternity has a Mission Score of 70/100. Revenue: $78K. Assets: $4K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Delaware Sec Chapter Of The Sigma Phi Epsilon Fraternity?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Delaware Sec Chapter Of The Sigma Phi Epsilon Fraternity is 200874442. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Delaware Sec Chapter Of The Sigma Phi Epsilon Fraternity spend its money?
Delaware Sec Chapter Of The Sigma Phi Epsilon Fraternity allocates 90% to programs, 10% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Delaware Sec Chapter Of The Sigma Phi Epsilon Fraternity's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Delaware Sec Chapter Of The Sigma Phi Epsilon Fraternity's tax-exempt status using EIN 200874442 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
The Delaware Sec Chapter Of The Sigma Phi Epsilon Fraternity demonstrates inconsistent financial health over the past decade. While the organization reported a surplus in the latest period (202306) with revenue of $78,091 exceeding expenses of $74,826, it has experienced several deficits in prior years, such as in 202206 where expenses ($101,106) significantly outstripped revenue ($92,632). The organization's assets have also fluctuated wildly, from a high of $62,794 in 202106 to a low of $281 in 201706 and 201506, currently standing at a modest $3,858. This volatility suggests potential challenges in consistent financial management or reliance on variable income streams.
Spending efficiency is difficult to fully assess without a detailed breakdown of expenses, as the provided data only includes total expenses. However, the consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all filings indicates that the organization is not allocating funds to executive salaries, which can be a positive sign for donor confidence regarding administrative overhead. The lack of liabilities across all reported periods is also a strong indicator of responsible financial management, as the organization appears to avoid debt.
In terms of transparency, the organization consistently files its IRS Form 990s, providing public access to its financial data. The absence of officer compensation simplifies the analysis of administrative costs. However, without a more granular breakdown of program versus administrative and fundraising expenses within the total expenses, a complete picture of spending efficiency and program focus remains somewhat obscured. The NTEE code B83 (Fraternal Societies) suggests a focus on member services, which would typically constitute program spending.