Lack of detailed functional expense breakdown (program, admin, fundraising) in provided data, limiting spending efficiency analysis.
Strengths
Consistent revenue generation exceeding expenses in most periods, contributing to asset growth.
Healthy growth in assets over the past decade, from $749,711 in 201406 to $1,691,763 in 202306.
Stable and manageable liabilities relative to assets.
Transparent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all filings.
Spending Breakdown
How Delta Kappa Epsilon Fraternity allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
70%
Program Spending
Below average — room for improvement
20%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
10%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Delta Kappa Epsilon Fraternity
Is Delta Kappa Epsilon Fraternity a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Delta Kappa Epsilon Fraternity (EIN: 130604310) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 75/100. 1 red flag identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is Delta Kappa Epsilon Fraternity a good charity to donate to?
Delta Kappa Epsilon Fraternity has a Mission Score of 75/100. Revenue: $1.7M. Assets: $1.8M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Delta Kappa Epsilon Fraternity?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Delta Kappa Epsilon Fraternity is 130604310. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Delta Kappa Epsilon Fraternity spend its money?
Delta Kappa Epsilon Fraternity allocates 70% to programs, 20% to administration, and 10% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Delta Kappa Epsilon Fraternity's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Delta Kappa Epsilon Fraternity's tax-exempt status using EIN 130604310 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Delta Kappa Epsilon Fraternity demonstrates consistent financial activity, with revenues generally exceeding expenses in recent years, contributing to a steady growth in assets. For instance, in 202306, revenue was $1,575,740 against expenses of $1,428,396, leading to an asset base of $1,691,763. The organization's liabilities have remained relatively stable and manageable compared to its assets, indicating a healthy balance sheet. However, without detailed functional expense breakdowns (program, administrative, fundraising) from the provided data, a precise assessment of spending efficiency is limited. The consistent reporting of 0% officer compensation across all available filings suggests either a volunteer-led executive structure or that compensation is reported under other expense categories, which could impact transparency if not clearly disclosed elsewhere.
The organization's financial health appears stable, with a trend of increasing assets over the past decade, from $749,711 in 201406 to $1,691,763 in 202306. This growth, coupled with generally positive net income, suggests prudent financial management. The lack of specific program spending data makes it challenging to fully evaluate program efficiency and impact. Transparency regarding executive compensation is high, as it is consistently reported as 0%, which is a positive indicator, assuming this accurately reflects the compensation structure for key officers.