Limited financial data (only one filing available)
NTEE code unknown, limiting direct peer comparison
Strengths
Positive net income in 2018 ($14,307 surplus)
No reported liabilities in 2018
No reported officer compensation, suggesting efficient leadership costs
Strong program spending ratio (estimated 85%)
Spending Breakdown
How Delta Phi Epsilon Sorority Inc allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
85%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
5%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about Delta Phi Epsilon Sorority Inc
Is Delta Phi Epsilon Sorority Inc a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, Delta Phi Epsilon Sorority Inc (EIN: 210677944) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 75/100. 2 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is Delta Phi Epsilon Sorority Inc a good charity to donate to?
Delta Phi Epsilon Sorority Inc has a Mission Score of 75/100. Revenue: $154K. Assets: $33K. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for Delta Phi Epsilon Sorority Inc?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for Delta Phi Epsilon Sorority Inc is 210677944. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does Delta Phi Epsilon Sorority Inc spend its money?
Delta Phi Epsilon Sorority Inc allocates 85% to programs, 10% to administration, and 5% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify Delta Phi Epsilon Sorority Inc's tax-exempt status?
You can verify Delta Phi Epsilon Sorority Inc's tax-exempt status using EIN 210677944 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
Delta Phi Epsilon Sorority Inc, with a single filing in 2018, demonstrates a relatively healthy financial position for its reported size. In 2018, the organization generated $154,474 in revenue against $140,167 in expenses, indicating a surplus for the period. Its assets stood at $32,893 with no reported liabilities, suggesting a stable balance sheet. However, with only one filing available, a comprehensive trend analysis of financial health and spending efficiency is limited. The absence of reported officer compensation in the available data could be a positive indicator of volunteer leadership or that compensation falls below reporting thresholds, but without further detail, it's difficult to fully assess transparency in this area. Overall, the organization appears to manage its finances prudently based on the single available filing, but more data would be needed for a definitive assessment of long-term sustainability and operational efficiency.