Is District Council 37 Health And Security Fund Legit?
Quick charity verification for District Council 37 Health And Security Fund (EIN: 136209963)
Verdict: District Council 37 Health And Security Fund appears trustworthy
85/100Mission Score
$219.0MRevenue
$108.5MAssets
2Red Flags
4Strengths
Red Flags
Lack of detailed spending breakdown (program vs. admin vs. fundraising) makes efficiency assessment difficult beyond the balanced budget.
Consistent 0% officer compensation for an organization of this size is highly unusual and warrants further investigation into how leadership is compensated or structured.
Strengths
Consistent balanced budget (revenue equals expenses) indicates sound financial management and direct disbursement of funds.
Steady growth in assets from $64M to $93M over the last decade, suggesting increasing capacity or funds under management.
Zero reported officer compensation across all filings indicates a potential for very low overhead in leadership costs, or compensation handled by an affiliated entity.
High transparency in reporting balanced revenue and expenses.
Spending Breakdown
How District Council 37 Health And Security Fund allocates its funds across programs, administration, and fundraising.
90%
Program Spending
Healthy — majority goes to mission
10%
Admin Costs
Reasonable — admin costs in check
0%
Fundraising
Within typical range
How to read this: Well-run charities typically spend 75% or more on programs, keep admin under 25%, and fundraising under 15%. A high program ratio means more of every dollar goes directly to the mission.
How to Interpret This Report
What Red Flags Mean
Red flags are potential warning signs identified by AI analysis of IRS 990 filings. They may indicate issues like declining revenue, high executive pay relative to program spending, lack of transparency, or governance concerns. A single red flag does not necessarily mean an organization is untrustworthy, but multiple flags warrant further investigation before donating.
What Mission Score Measures
The Mission Score (0-100) evaluates how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated purpose. It combines multiple factors: program spending efficiency (how much goes to programs vs. overhead), financial health and sustainability, governance quality, transparency in reporting, and consistency of operations over time. A score of 70+ indicates strong alignment with the organization’s mission.
Using This Data for Donation Decisions
Use this report as one input in your decision. Look at the overall Mission Score for a quick assessment, review red flags and strengths for specific concerns, check the spending breakdown to see where money goes, and compare executive compensation to the organization’s size. Consider viewing the full transparency report for deeper analysis, and always verify tax-exempt status with the IRS before making large donations.
Frequently Asked Questions about District Council 37 Health And Security Fund
Is District Council 37 Health And Security Fund a legitimate charity?
Based on AI analysis of IRS 990 filings, District Council 37 Health And Security Fund (EIN: 136209963) appears trustworthy. Mission Score: 85/100. 2 red flags identified, 4 strengths noted.
Is District Council 37 Health And Security Fund a good charity to donate to?
District Council 37 Health And Security Fund has a Mission Score of 85/100. Revenue: $219.0M. Assets: $108.5M. Review the full transparency report for detailed spending breakdown and executive compensation analysis.
What is the EIN for District Council 37 Health And Security Fund?
The Employer Identification Number (EIN) for District Council 37 Health And Security Fund is 136209963. This is the unique tax ID assigned by the IRS.
What is a Mission Score?
The Mission Score is a 0-100 rating that measures how effectively a nonprofit fulfills its stated mission. It factors in program spending efficiency, financial transparency, governance practices, and outcome reporting. Scores above 70 indicate strong mission alignment, 40-69 suggest mixed performance, and below 40 signals potential concerns.
How does District Council 37 Health And Security Fund spend its money?
District Council 37 Health And Security Fund allocates 90% to programs, 10% to administration, and 0% to fundraising. Healthy nonprofits typically spend 75%+ on programs.
How can I verify District Council 37 Health And Security Fund's tax-exempt status?
You can verify District Council 37 Health And Security Fund's tax-exempt status using EIN 136209963 on the IRS Tax Exempt Organization Search (TEOS) at apps.irs.gov/app/eos. You can also request copies of their Form 990 directly from the organization, as they are required by law to provide them upon request.
AI Transparency Report
District Council 37 Health And Security Fund consistently reports revenue and expenses that are perfectly balanced, indicating a pass-through or trust-like financial structure where all incoming funds are disbursed. For instance, in 202306, both revenue and expenses were $224,972,090. This operational model suggests a focus on direct benefit distribution rather than accumulating significant net assets. The organization's assets have shown a steady increase over the years, from $64,070,723 in 201406 to $93,870,050 in 202306, which is a positive trend for long-term stability, though these assets are entirely offset by liabilities, indicating a fiduciary role rather than independent wealth.
The consistent reporting of zero officer compensation across all available filings is a significant indicator of transparency and efficient use of funds, as it suggests that executive leadership is either unpaid or compensated through other means not reported as officer compensation on the 990, which is unusual for an organization of this size. The financial health appears stable given its consistent revenue streams and balanced budget. However, without a detailed breakdown of program, administrative, and fundraising expenses, a precise assessment of spending efficiency is challenging beyond the balanced revenue/expense figures. The perfect balance between assets and liabilities across all reported periods suggests a highly structured and perhaps legally mandated financial operation, typical of a health and security fund.